Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40722731›Full record

ReviewBiomedicines2025

Protocol Biopsies in Kidney Transplant Recipients: Current Practice After Much Discussion.

Christina Lazarou, Eleni Moysidou, Michalis Christodoulou, Stamatia Stai, Georgios Lioulios, Efstratios Kasimatis, Asimina Fylaktou, Maria Stangou

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomedicines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Christina LazarouSchool of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 56429 Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID 0009-0004-4583-361X
Eleni MoysidouSchool of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 56429 Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-6874-7173
Michalis ChristodoulouSchool of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 56429 Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID 0000-0001-9565-6931
Stamatia StaiSchool of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 56429 Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID 0000-0001-6914-9274
Georgios LiouliosSchool of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 56429 Thessaloniki, Greece.
Efstratios KasimatisSchool of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 56429 Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID 0000-0001-7027-1402
Asimina FylaktouDepartment of Immunology, National Peripheral Histocompatibility Center, Hippokration Hospital, 54642 Thessaloniki, Greece.
Maria StangouSchool of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 56429 Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID 0000-0003-2496-9863

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protocol biopsies are a fundamental component in the management of kidney transplant recipients, offering critical insights into graft health by detecting subclinical pathological changes undetectable through routine clinical and laboratory assessments. Conducted at predetermined intervals, these biopsies enable early identification of subclinical rejection, chronic allograft nephropathy, drug-induced toxicities, viral infections such as BK polyomavirus nephropathy, and recurrence of primary glomerular diseases. Early detection facilitates timely therapeutic interventions, including immunosuppressive regimen adjustments, which are pivotal in preserving graft function and improving long-term outcomes. While the optimal timing and frequency of protocol biopsies vary, early post-transplant biopsies within the first year are widely advocated. High-risk groups, including ABO- and HLA-incompatible recipients and those with recurrent primary nephropathies, particularly benefit from surveillance biopsies. Despite the invasive nature and associated risks of biopsy procedures, most experts agree that the benefits outweigh the risks in selected populations. However, the role of routine protocol biopsies in low-risk patients remains debated due to unclear long-term outcome improvements and resource considerations. Retrospective observational studies have demonstrated the ability of protocol biopsies to detect subclinical pathological changes such as rejection, drug toxicity, viral infections, and recurrent diseases before clinical or laboratory abnormalities appear. These studies also highlight the impact of biopsy-guided interventions on graft survival and management in high-risk groups (e.g., HLA- and ABO-incompatible recipients, and patients at risk for disease recurrence). Furthermore, randomized controlled trials provide higher-level evidence showing that protocol biopsy-guided interventions improve graft function, reflected by better serum creatinine levels and glomerular filtration rates, compared to indicated biopsies alone. They also emphasize the importance of both early and late surveillance biopsies for predicting long-term outcomes. Expert opinion and consensus acknowledge the benefits of protocol biopsies for early detection and tailored management but also highlight ongoing debates regarding their routine use in low-risk patients due to risks, costs, and resource considerations. Overall, protocol biopsies represent a valuable tool for personalized graft monitoring and management, aiding in early detection of complications, guiding immunosuppressive therapy, and enhancing graft longevity. Further multicenter randomized trials are needed to refine guidelines and optimize their clinical utility.

Indexed as

acute rejectionchronic rejectionimmunosuppressionkidney transplantationprognosisprotocol biopsy

Identifiers

PMID40722731
PMCPMC12292874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.