ReviewBiomedicines2025
Comprehensive Review: Mavacamten and Aficamten in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.
Review in Biomedicines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- A First-in-Human Study of Ulacamten, a Novel Cardiac Myosin Inhibitor for HFpEF.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2026Trial
- Safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and food effect of HRS-1893, a cardiac myosin inhibitor, in healthy subjects.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Trial
- Forward Dynamics: Modern Insights into Mitral Systolic Anterior Motion.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Review
- [Update on hypertrophic cardiomyopathy].Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Advances in Non-Invasive Myocardial Stiffness Assessment and Clinical Applications in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Pharmacologic therapies for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: The past, the present, and the future.JRSM cardiovascular diseaseReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is the most common monogenic heart disease, with an estimated prevalence of 1:600 in the general population, and is associated with significant morbidity. HCM is characterized by left ventricular hypertrophy and interventricular septal thickening due to sarcomere protein gene mutations. The recent emergence of cardiac myosin inhibitors (CMIs), specifically mavacamten and aficamten, has introduced a paradigm shift in HCM management by directly targeting the hypercontractile state of the disease. This review comprehensively discusses the molecular mechanisms of mavacamten and aficamten, highlighting their biochemical similarities and differences from available data. It evaluates their reported efficacy in completed clinical trials, such as reducing left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) obstruction, improving functional capacity, and enhancing quality of life in HCM. It further provides insight and updates to ongoing trials of both CMIs. Finally, it compares and elaborates on the safety profiles of mavacamten and aficamten, discussing their favorable safety profiles shown in completed studies. In current clinical practice, only mavacamten is approved for use, and clinical insights concerning both CMIs are limited, but encouraging. In summary, cardiac myosin inhibitors are a promising class of disease-modifying drugs for HCM with proven short-term safety and efficacy, but limited data are available to fully determine their long-term effects and efficacy in diverse patient populations. Ongoing research is necessary to further explore and define their role in HCM management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.