Intergrader Agreement on Qualitative and Quantitative Assessment of Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Using Ultra-Widefield Imaging: INSPIRED Study Report 1.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

1. Diagnostic accuracy and clinical performance of deep learning models for grading diabetic retinopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026
   Pooled it
2. Retinal non-perfusion progression in severe non-proliferative and proliferative diabetic retinopathy over time: INSPIRED study report 2.Eye (London, England) · 2026
   Article
3. The positive correlation between the progressive photoreceptor damage and the increased macular leakage indicating the severity of diabetic retinopathy.Journal of diabetes investigation · 2026
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as