Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40722429›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Distinguishing Dyslexia, Attention Deficit, and Learning Disorders: Insights from AI and Eye Movements.

Alae Eddine El Hmimdi, Zoï Kapoula

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alae Eddine El HmimdiOrasis-Eye Analytics & Rehabilitation Research Group, Spinoff CNRS, 12 Rue Lacretelle, 75015 Paris, France.
Zoï KapoulaOrasis-Eye Analytics & Rehabilitation Research Group, Spinoff CNRS, 12 Rue Lacretelle, 75015 Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigates whether eye movement abnormalities can differentiate between distinct clinical annotations of dyslexia, attention deficit, or school learning difficulties in children. Utilizing a selection of saccade and vergence eye movement data from a large clinical dataset recorded across 20 European centers using the REMOBI and AIDEAL technologies, this research study focuses on individuals annotated with only one of the three annotations. The selected dataset includes 355 individuals for saccade tests and 454 for vergence tasks. Eye movement analysis was performed with AIDEAL software. Key parameters, such as amplitude, latency, duration, and velocity, are extracted and processed to remove outliers and standardize values. Machine learning models, including logistic regression, random forest, support vector machines, and neural networks, are trained using a GroupKFold strategy to ensure patient data are present in either the training or test set. Results from the machine learning models revealed that children annotated solely with dyslexia could be successfully identified based on their saccade and vergence eye movements, while identification of the other two categories was less distinct. Statistical evaluation using the Kruskal-Wallis test highlighted significant group mean differences in several saccade parameters, such as a velocity and latency, particularly for dyslexics relative to the other two groups. These findings suggest that specific terminology, such as "dyslexia", may capture unique eye movement patterns, underscoring the importance of eye movement analysis as a diagnostic tool for understanding the complexity of these conditions. This study emphasizes the potential of eye movement analysis in refining diagnostic precision and capturing the nuanced differences between dyslexia, attention deficits, and general learning difficulties.

Indexed as

attention deficitdyslexiamachine learningsaccadescholar disordersvergence

Identifiers

PMID40722429
PMCPMC12292690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.