ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Comparison of Tissue Repair with Different Types of Microdissection Tips: A Randomized Histomorphometric Evaluation in Rats.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The aim of the study was to compare tissue repair of incisions made using different microdissection electrocautery tips in an in vivo animal model. Skin incisions were made, including the subcutaneous tissue, in 30 adult Wistar rats using four types of instruments: a scalpel blade number 15, knife-type electrocautery, microdissection needle, and thin-cut electrode. The animals were divided into five groups based on the euthanasia time-24 h, 48 h, 72 h, 7 days, and 14 days. Each animal received four incisions, one with each type of instrument. Histological and histomorphometric analyses were performed using hematoxylin and eosin (HE) and Picrosirius red stains. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed that the type of dissector had no significant effect on type I collagen levels (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.