ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Exercises Based on a Non-Immersive Virtual Reality Application for Upper Limb Rehabilitation.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Review of Indian-Based Drones in the Agriculture Sector: Issues, Challenges, and Solutions.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Virtual reality (VR) technologies have gained increasing attention in the field of physical rehabilitation due to their potential to enhance patient engagement and provide adaptive, feedback-rich environments. In this study, we report on the development and preliminary evaluation of a VR-based rehabilitation application aimed at improving upper extremity function, including muscle strength, endurance, and joint mobility. The application delivers a structured set of interactive exercises designed to support recovery through engaging, gamified tasks with real-time performance feedback and scalable difficulty levels. A pilot usability study was conducted with a cohort of target users to assess the system's practicality, therapeutic relevance, and user satisfaction. Qualitative data were collected to evaluate usability, effectiveness, and areas for further improvement. Preliminary results suggest that the VR application is usable, accessible, and well-received by users, with high levels of engagement reported throughout the intervention. Participants also provided constructive feedback, emphasizing the potential benefits of incorporating enhanced sensory feedback mechanisms to improve immersion and therapeutic impact. These initial findings support the viability of VR-based rehabilitation tools and provide a foundation for future clinical studies aimed at validating their efficacy in diverse patient populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.