ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Plug-and-Play Self-Supervised Denoising for Pulmonary Perfusion MRI.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pulmonary dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI is clinically useful for assessing pulmonary perfusion, but its signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) is limited. A self-supervised learning network-based plug-and-play (PnP) denoising model was developed to improve the image quality of pulmonary perfusion MRI. A dataset of patients with suspected pulmonary diseases was used. Asymmetric pixel-shuffle downsampling blind-spot network (AP-BSN) training inputs were two-dimensional background-subtracted perfusion images without clean ground truth. The AP-BSN is incorporated into a PnP model (PnP-BSN) for balancing noise control and image fidelity. Model performance was evaluated by SNR, sharpness, and overall image quality from two radiologists. The fractal dimension and k-means segmentation of the pulmonary perfusion images were calculated for comparing denoising performance. The model was trained on 29 patients and tested on 8 patients. The performance of PnP-BSN was compared to denoising convolutional neural network (DnCNN) and a Gaussian filter. PnP-BSN showed the highest reader scores in terms of SNR, sharpness, and overall image quality as scored by two radiologists. The expert scoring results for DnCNN, Gaussian, and PnP-BSN were 2.25 ± 0.65, 2.44 ± 0.73, and 3.56 ± 0.73 for SNR; 2.62 ± 0.52, 2.62 ± 0.52, and 3.38 ± 0.64 for sharpness; and 2.16 ± 0.33, 2.34 ± 0.42, and 3.53 ± 0.51 for overall image quality (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.