ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Analysis of Microbiome for AP and CRC Discrimination.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- A systematic review of artificial intelligence and machine learning for gut microbiome-based CRC screening.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Review
- Editorial: Recent Advances in Gastrointestinal Cancers: From Microbiota Modulation to New Therapeutic Approaches.Biomedicines · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microbiome data analysis is essential for understanding the role of microbial communities in human health. However, limited data availability often hinders research progress, and synthetic data generation could offer a promising solution to this problem. This study aims to explore the use of machine learning (ML) to enrich an unbalanced dataset consisting of microbial operational taxonomic unit (OTU) counts of 148 samples, belonging to 61 patients. In detail, 34 samples are from 16 adenomatous polyps (AP) patients, while 114 samples are from 46 colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. Synthesis of AP and CRC samples was conducted using the Synthetic Data Vault Python library, employing a Gaussian Copula synthesiser. Subsequently, the synthesised data quality was evaluated using a logistic regression model in parallel with an optimised support vector machine algorithm (polynomial kernel). The data quality is considered good when neither of the two algorithms can discriminate between real and synthetic data, showing low accuracy, F1 score, and precision values. Furthermore, additional statistical tests were employed to confirm the similarity between real and synthetic data. After data validation, layer-wise relevance propagation (LRP) was performed on a deep learning classifier to extract important OTU features from the generated dataset, to discriminate between CRC patients and those affected by AP. Exploiting the acquired features, which correspond to unique bacterial taxa, ML classifiers were trained and tested to estimate the validity of such microorganisms in recognising AP and CRC samples. The simplified version of the original OTU table opens up opportunities for further investigations, especially in the realm of extensive data synthesis. This involves a deeper exploration and augmentation of the condensed data to uncover new insights and patterns that might not be readily apparent in the original, more complex form. Digging deeper into the simplified data may help us better grasp the biological or ecological processes reflected in the OTU data. Transitioning from this exploration, the synergy of ML and synthetic data enrichment holds promise for advancing microbiome research. This approach enhances classification accuracy and reveals hidden microbial markers that could prove valuable in clinical practice as a diagnostic and prognostic tool.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.