Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40722404›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Solid-State Anaerobic Digestion of Organic Solid Poultry Waste for Biomethane Production.

Faryal Fatima, Raghava R Kommalapati

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Faryal FatimaCenter for Energy and Environmental Sustainability, Prairie View A&M University, Prairie View, TX 77446, USA.
Raghava R KommalapatiCenter for Energy and Environmental Sustainability, Prairie View A&M University, Prairie View, TX 77446, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3267-6684

Funding

National Science Foundation 1914692USDA-National Institute of Food and Agriculture 2020-38821-31091
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examines biodegradability (BD) and optimum conditions for the solid-state anaerobic digestion (SS-AD) of organic solid poultry waste (organs, intestines, offal, and unprocessed meat) to maximize biomethane production. Three main parameters, substrate-to-inoculum (S/I) ratio, pH, and temperature, were evaluated for the SS-AD of organic solid poultry waste. pH was evaluated at non-adjusted pH, initially adjusted pH, and controlled pH conditions at a constant S/I ratio of 0.5 and temperature of 35 ± 1 °C. The S/I ratios were examined at (0.3, 0.5, 1, and 2) at a controlled pH of ≈7.9 and temperature of 35 ± 1 °C. The temperature was assessed at mesophilic (35 ± 1 °C) and thermophilic (55 ± 1 °C) conditions with a constant S/I ratio of 0.5 and controlled pH of ≈7.9. The results demonstrate that the highest biomethane production and BD were achieved with a controlled pH of ≈7.9 (689 ± 10 mg/L, 97.5 ± 1.4%). The initially adjusted pH (688 ± 14 mg/L, 97.3 ± 1.9%) and an S/I ratio of 0.3 (685 ± 8 mg/L, 96.8 ± 1.2%) had approximately equivalent outcomes. The thermophilic conditions yielded 78% lower biomethane yield than mesophilic conditions. The challenge of lower biomethane yield under thermophilic conditions will be resolved in future studies by determining the rate-limiting step. These observations highlight that SS-AD is a promising technology for biomethane production from solid organic poultry waste.

Indexed as

biodegradabilitymesophilicorganic solid poultry wastepHsolid-state anaerobic digestionsubstrates to inoculumthermophilic

Identifiers

PMID40722404
PMCPMC12292423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.