Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40722395›Full record

ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Organic and Synthetic Substitutes in Tracheal Reconstruction: A Scoping Review (2015-2025).

Ana Caroline Dos Santos, Guilherme Machado Holzlsauer, João Paulo Ruiz Lucio de Lima Parra, Raí André Querino Candelária, Thamires Santos da Silva, Rodrigo da Silva Nunes Barreto, Maria Angelica Miglino

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ana Caroline Dos SantosGraduate Program in Anatomy of Domestic and Wild Animals, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo (FMVZ/USP), São Paulo 05508-270, Brazil.
Guilherme Machado HolzlsauerDepartment of Veterinary Clinic and Surgery, Faculty of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Jaboticabal 14884-900, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1647-8861
João Paulo Ruiz Lucio de Lima ParraDepartment of Animal Anatomy, University of Marilia (UNIMAR), Marília 17525-902, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-7575-2117
Raí André Querino CandeláriaGraduate Program in Anatomy of Domestic and Wild Animals, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo (FMVZ/USP), São Paulo 05508-270, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0001-0510-5800
Thamires Santos da SilvaXenoBr, Rua do Matão, 106, Cidade Universitária, São Paulo 05508-090, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7848-8558
Rodrigo da Silva Nunes BarretoDepartment of Animal Morphology and Physiology, Faculty of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Jaboticabal 14884-900, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5240-6959
Maria Angelica MiglinoDepartment of Animal Anatomy, University of Marilia (UNIMAR), Marília 17525-902, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-4979-115X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tracheal defects have been the focus of research since the 19th century, but reconstructing this complex structure remains challenging. Identifying a safe, effective tracheal substitute is a key goal of surgery. This integrative review explores current tracheal substitutes and tissue engineering techniques. Data were collected from June 2024 to March 2025 from electronically available databases. Articles published between 2015 and 2025 were selected using the individualized protocol for each database. After screening 190 articles, 82 were excluded, and 108 were reviewed, with 100 meeting the final inclusion criteria. Recent substitutes include three-dimensional synthetic grafts made from polycaprolactone and copolyamide with thermoplastic elastomer, thermoplastic polyurethane and polylactic acid. Additionally, models using decellularized and recellularized tracheal matrix scaffolds and bioprinting techniques are being developed. Comparative studies of synthetic grafts and tracheal scaffolds, as well as cell self-aggregation methods to create tracheal analogues, are discussed. Advances in hybrid approaches combining synthetic polymers with extracellular matrix components aim to improve biocompatibility and functional integration. The importance of selecting appropriate preclinical animal models, such as goats, is also highlighted for translational relevance. Further research is required to refine protocols, overcome challenges related to vascularization and immune response, and ensure the development of clinically viable, long-lasting tracheal substitutes.

Indexed as

biocompatibilityscaffoldtissue engineeringtracheatracheal reconstructiontransplant

Identifiers

PMID40722395
PMCPMC12292422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.