Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40722392›Full record

ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025

The Use of Gelatin Methacrylate (GelMA) in Cartilage Tissue Engineering: A Comprehensive Review.

Kush Savsani, Alexandra Hunter Aitchison, Nicholas B Allen, Elsie A Adams, Samuel B Adams

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kush SavsaniSchool of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23298, USA.
Alexandra Hunter AitchisonDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Duke University Hospital, Durham, NC 27708, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7470-0067
Nicholas B AllenDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Duke University Hospital, Durham, NC 27708, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4866-125X
Elsie A AdamsDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Duke University Hospital, Durham, NC 27708, USA.
Samuel B AdamsDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Duke University Hospital, Durham, NC 27708, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1020-1167

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cartilage injuries, due to their limited regenerative capacity, often result in chronic pain and functional impairment. These injuries are difficult to manage with conventional surgical repair techniques; therefore, alternative treatments are necessary. Gelatin methacrylate (GelMA) has emerged as a promising biomaterial for cartilage tissue engineering due to its biocompatibility, tunable mechanical properties, and ability to be used in advanced applications like 3D bioprinting. This review examines the synthesis, properties, and limitations of GelMA in cartilage repair, focusing on its applications in 3D bioprinting for the creation of patient-specific cartilage constructs. It also highlights preclinical studies exploring the potential of GelMA-based scaffolds in various animal models. Despite its advantages, challenges remain, such as the mechanical limitations of GelMA and its degradation rate in dynamic environments. Hybrid scaffolds, in situ bioprinting, and personalized bioinks offer solutions to these issues. Ultimately, long-term clinical trials are needed to assess the durability and efficacy of GelMA-based scaffolds in human applications. Future research is aimed at overcoming these challenges, improving the mechanical strength of GelMA scaffolds, and enhancing their clinical translation for cartilage repair.

Indexed as

3D bioprintingcartilage tissue engineeringgelatin methacrylateGelMAhybrid scaffolds

Identifiers

PMID40722392
PMCPMC12292614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.