ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Design and Bench Testing of a Novel, Pediatric, Non-Invasive, Bubble Bilevel Positive Pressure Ventilation Device.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Acute lower respiratory tract infections are a leading cause of death in individuals under the age of 5 years, mostly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The lack of respiratory support systems contributes to the poor outcomes. Bubble CPAP is widely used for non-invasive respiratory support, but sicker children often require support over what CPAP provides in the form of BiPAP. We developed and tested a simple bubble-based bilevel ventilator (Bubble bi-vent) and compared it with a standard care BiPAP device. The bubble bilevel device consisted of a single tube submerged in a water-sealed column to maintain end-expiratory positive airway pressure. It moves vertically via an electric motor to also provide inspiratory positive airway pressure for augmentation of lung volumes, with the duration and frequency of breaths controlled by a microprocessor. We tested this novel device in passively breathing mechanical lung models for infants and small children. We compared pressure and tidal volume delivery between the novel device and a Trilogy BiPAP ventilator. The results showed that the Bubble bi-vent could deliver set pressures in a mechanical lung and was comparable to a standard Trilogy ventilator. While two different bubble-based bilevel pressure devices have been piloted for neonates and adults, our results demonstrate the feasibility of bubble bilevel ventilation for infants and small children with moderate to severe lung disease for whom this was previously not described.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.