ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Advancements in Radiology Report Generation: A Comprehensive Analysis.
Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Automated Structured Pre-Report Generation for Nephrolithiasis on Non-Contrast CT: Development and Report-Level Evaluation of a Deep Learning Framework.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Educational effectiveness of short-term e-learning intervention on chest radiograph assessment skills among radiological technology students: a pre- and post-comparative study.Radiological physics and technology · 2026Article
- Automated Report Generation in Ophthalmology: Integrating Artificial Intelligence, Multimodal Imaging, and Clinical Data.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2026Review
- Development and Proof-of-Concept Evaluation of a Structured Reporting Template for Emergency Radiology Using Synthetic Cases.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The growing demand for radiological services, amplified by a shortage of qualified radiologists, has resulted in significant challenges in managing the increasing workload while ensuring the accuracy and timeliness of radiological reports. To address these issues, recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI), particularly in transformer models, vision-language models (VLMs), and Large Language Models (LLMs), have emerged as promising solutions for radiology report generation (RRG). These systems aim to make diagnosis faster, reduce the workload for radiologists by handling routine tasks, and help generate high-quality, consistent reports that support better clinical decision-making. This comprehensive study covers RRG developments from 2021 to 2025, focusing on emerging transformer-based and VLMs, highlighting the key methods, architectures, and techniques employed. We examine the datasets currently available for RRG applications and the evaluation metrics commonly used to assess model performance. In addition, the study analyzes the performance of the leading models in the field, identifying the top performers and offering insights into their strengths and limitations. Finally, this study proposes new directions for future research, emphasizing potential improvements to existing systems and exploring new avenues for advancing the capabilities of AI in radiology report generation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.