Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40722385›Full record

ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Advancements in Radiology Report Generation: A Comprehensive Analysis.

Dima Mamdouh, Mariam Attia, Mohamed Osama, Nesma Mohamed, Abdelrahman Lotfy, Tamer Arafa, Essam A Rashed, Ghada Khoriba

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Dima MamdouhCenter for Informatics Science, School of Information Technology and Computer Science (ITCS), Nile University, Giza 12588, Egypt.ORCID 0009-0003-2507-0857
Mariam AttiaCenter for Informatics Science, School of Information Technology and Computer Science (ITCS), Nile University, Giza 12588, Egypt.ORCID 0009-0008-3039-5548
Mohamed OsamaCenter for Informatics Science, School of Information Technology and Computer Science (ITCS), Nile University, Giza 12588, Egypt.
Nesma MohamedCenter for Informatics Science, School of Information Technology and Computer Science (ITCS), Nile University, Giza 12588, Egypt.ORCID 0009-0004-5771-9101
Abdelrahman LotfyCenter for Informatics Science, School of Information Technology and Computer Science (ITCS), Nile University, Giza 12588, Egypt.ORCID 0009-0004-9816-7454
Tamer ArafaCenter for Informatics Science, School of Information Technology and Computer Science (ITCS), Nile University, Giza 12588, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0001-9553-8265
Essam A RashedGraduate School of Information Science, University of Hyogo, Kobe 650-0047, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-6571-9807
Ghada KhoribaCenter for Informatics Science, School of Information Technology and Computer Science (ITCS), Nile University, Giza 12588, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0001-7332-0759

Funding

Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST), PRESTO JPMJPR23P7
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The growing demand for radiological services, amplified by a shortage of qualified radiologists, has resulted in significant challenges in managing the increasing workload while ensuring the accuracy and timeliness of radiological reports. To address these issues, recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI), particularly in transformer models, vision-language models (VLMs), and Large Language Models (LLMs), have emerged as promising solutions for radiology report generation (RRG). These systems aim to make diagnosis faster, reduce the workload for radiologists by handling routine tasks, and help generate high-quality, consistent reports that support better clinical decision-making. This comprehensive study covers RRG developments from 2021 to 2025, focusing on emerging transformer-based and VLMs, highlighting the key methods, architectures, and techniques employed. We examine the datasets currently available for RRG applications and the evaluation metrics commonly used to assess model performance. In addition, the study analyzes the performance of the leading models in the field, identifying the top performers and offering insights into their strengths and limitations. Finally, this study proposes new directions for future research, emphasizing potential improvements to existing systems and exploring new avenues for advancing the capabilities of AI in radiology report generation.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecomputer visiongraphsmedical imagingnatural language processingradiology report generationtransformers

Identifiers

PMID40722385
PMCPMC12292164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.