ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Automated UPDRS Gait Scoring Using Wearable Sensor Fusion and Deep Learning.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Surface Electromyography for Parkinson's Disease Monitoring: A Review of Machine and Deep Learning Techniques.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- AI-Enabled Flexible Sensing Ecosystems for Parkinson's Disease: Advancing Digital Biomarkers and Closed-Loop Interventions.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- AI-Enabled Wearables for Motor Function Assessment and Rehabilitation in Parkinson Disease: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Review
- Lower limb motor effects of DBS neurofeedback in Parkinson's disease assessed through IMU-based UPDRS movement quality metrics.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Evaluation of Parkinson's Disease Motor Symptoms via Wearable Inertial Measurements Units and Surface Electromyography Sensors.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The quantitative assessment of Parkinson's disease (PD) is critical for guiding diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation. Conventional clinical evaluations-heavily dependent on manual rating scales such as the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS)-are time-consuming and prone to inter-rater variability. In this study, we propose a fully automated UPDRS gait-scoring framework. Our method combines (a) surface electromyography (EMG) signals and (b) inertial measurement unit (IMU) data into a single deep learning model. Our end-to-end network comprises three specialized branches-a diagnosis head, an evaluation head, and a balance head-whose outputs are integrated via a customized fusion-detection module to emulate the multidimensional assessments performed by clinicians. We validated our system on 21 PD patients and healthy controls performing a simple walking task while wearing a four-channel EMG array on the lower limbs and 2 shank-mounted IMUs. It achieved a mean classification accuracy of 92.8% across UPDRS levels 0-2. This approach requires minimal subject effort and sensor setup, significantly cutting clinician workload associated with traditional UPDRS evaluations while improving objectivity. The results demonstrate the potential of wearable sensor-driven deep learning methods to deliver rapid, reliable PD gait assessment in both clinical and home settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.