ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Evaluating Assistive Technology Outcomes in Boccia Athletes with Disabilities Using AI-Based Kinematic Analysis.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Measuring Assistive Technology Outcomes via AI-Based Kinematic Modeling of Individualized Routine Learning in Elite Boccia Athletes with Severe Cerebral Palsy: A Longitudinal Case Series.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study explores how artificial intelligence (AI) can support the evaluation of assistive technology outcomes in adaptive sports, focusing on elite boccia athletes with disabilities. Using a multi-stage motion analysis framework, we integrated OpenPose, ViTPose, and Lifting to estimate seated joint kinematics with greater precision. Match footage from 12 athletes at the 2018 Asia-Pacific Boccia Open was analyzed across five biomechanical phases: preparation, acceleration, peak, release, and follow-through. AI-enhanced 2D and 3D pose estimation methods were applied to assess throwing strategies and motor variability. ViTPose outperformed OpenPose in joint detection accuracy (F1-score: 85% vs. 79.5%), while Lifting improved 3D estimation by reducing joint position error by 16%. Principal Component Analysis revealed greater movement consistency in overhand throws compared to underhand techniques. The proposed pipeline provides an interpretable and scalable method for measuring performance, motor control, and strategy-specific movement outcomes in boccia, offering practical applications for evidence-based coaching, athlete classification, and the design of inclusive assistive sport technologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.