ReviewBrain sciences2025
State-Dependent Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Synchronized with Electroencephalography: Mechanisms, Applications, and Future Directions.
Review in Brain sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Closed-loop neuromodulation: a paradigm shift in precision neuroscience for clinical and cognitive applications.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with electroencephalography (TMS-EEG) has emerged as a transformative tool for probing cortical dynamics with millisecond precision. This review examines the state-dependent nature of TMS-EEG, a critical yet underexplored dimension influencing measurement reliability and clinical applicability. By integrating TMS's neuromodulatory capacity with EEG's temporal resolution, this synergy enables real-time analysis of brain network dynamics under varying neural states. We delineate foundational mechanisms of TMS-evoked potentials (TEPs), discuss challenges posed by temporal and inter-individual variability, and evaluate advanced paradigms such as closed-loop and task-embedded TMS-EEG. The former leverages real-time EEG feedback to synchronize stimulation with oscillatory phases, while the latter aligns TMS pulses with task-specific cognitive phases to map transient network activations. Current limitations-including hardware constraints, signal artifacts, and inconsistent preprocessing pipelines-are critically analyzed. Future directions emphasize adaptive algorithms for neural state prediction, phase-specific stimulation protocols, and standardized methodologies to enhance reproducibility. By bridging mechanistic insights with personalized neuromodulation strategies, state-dependent TMS-EEG holds promise for advancing both basic neuroscience and precision medicine, particularly in psychiatric and neurological disorders characterized by dynamic neural dysregulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.