Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40722299›Full record

ArticleBrain sciences2025

Multimodal Knowledge Distillation for Emotion Recognition.

Zhenxuan Zhang, Guanyu Lu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Zhenxuan ZhangState Key Laboratory of Media Convergence and Communication, Communication University of China, Beijing 100024, China.
Guanyu LuSchool of Cyberspace Security, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China.ORCID 0009-0001-1210-3600

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multimodal emotion recognition has emerged as a prominent field in affective computing, offering superior performance compared to single-modality methods. Among various physiological signals, EEG signals and EOG data are highly valued for their complementary strengths in emotion recognition. However, the practical application of EEG-based approaches is often hindered by high costs and operational complexity, making EOG a more feasible alternative in real-world scenarios. To address this limitation, this study introduces a novel framework for multimodal knowledge distillation, designed to improve the practicality of emotion decoding while maintaining high accuracy, with the framework including a multimodal fusion module to extract and integrate interactive and heterogeneous features, and a unimodal student model structurally aligned with the multimodal teacher model for better knowledge alignment. The framework combines EEG and EOG signals into a unified model and distills the fused multimodal features into a simplified EOG-only model. To facilitate efficient knowledge transfer, the approach incorporates a dynamic feedback mechanism that adjusts the guidance provided by the multimodal model to the unimodal model during the distillation process based on performance metrics. The proposed method was comprehensively evaluated on two datasets based on EEG and EOG signals. The accuracy of the valence and arousal of the proposed model in the DEAP dataset are 70.38% and 60.41%, respectively. The accuracy of valence and arousal in the BJTU-Emotion dataset are 61.31% and 60.31%, respectively. The proposed method achieves state-of-the-art classification performance compared to the baseline method, with statistically significant improvements confirmed by paired

Indexed as

deep learningemotion BCIemotion recognitionmultimodal knowledge distillationphysiological signals

Identifiers

PMID40722299
PMCPMC12293177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.