ArticleBrain sciences2025
Relationship Between Nutritional Indexes and Clinical Outcomes in Stroke Patients Undergoing Mechanical Thrombectomy.
Article in Brain sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association of malnutrition with in-hospital outcomes among patients hospitalized with dermatomyositis or polymyositis.Clinical rheumatology · 2026Article
- Evaluation of systemic inflammation- and nutrition-based indices in the prediction of HPV persistence.BMC women's health · 2025Article
- Lactate dehydrogenase and short-term mortality in ICU patients with ischemic stroke: a single-center retrospective analysis of MIMIC-IV.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
- A vitamin-biomarker risk score for 90-day functional outcome after acute ischemic stroke: development and internal validation in a retrospective cohort.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesNutritional status is increasingly acknowledged as a pivotal determinant of clinical course and recovery in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Malnutrition can compromise immune competence, delay neurological recovery, and exacerbate adverse outcomes, particularly in those undergoing intensive interventions such as mechanical thrombectomy (MT). To objectively assess nutritional status, indices such as the Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) and the Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score have been utilized in various clinical populations. These indices incorporate routinely available laboratory parameters, reflecting both nutritional and inflammatory states. This study explores whether PNI and CONUT scores are associated with 90-day clinical outcomes in AIS patients treated with MT, aiming to evaluate their potential utility as prognostic biomarkers in acute stroke care.
methodsA total of 404 patients with AIS who underwent MT between 2023 and 2024 were retrospectively evaluated. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data were collected, and nutritional status was assessed using PNI and CONUT scores. Clinical outcomes were stratified as favorable (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] 0-2) or unfavorable (mRS 3-6) at 90 days post-stroke.
resultsAmong the 404 patients included in the study, 50.5% had favorable and 49.5% had unfavorable clinical outcomes. Patients with favorable outcomes were younger (71 vs. 78 years,
conclusionsAmong the two nutritional indices evaluated, the CONUT score demonstrated significant prognostic value in predicting 90-day clinical outcomes after MT. In contrast, the PNI showed limited discriminatory power, highlighting the superiority of CONUT as a reliable biomarker in acute stroke care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.