ReviewBrain sciences2025
Beliefs in Right Hemisphere Syndromes: From Denial to Distortion.
Review in Brain sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Theoretical, Clinical, and Rehabilitative Aspects of Anosognosia an Extended Editorial.Brain sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Striking belief distortions may accompany various disorders of awareness that are predominantly associated with right hemispheric cerebral dysfunction. Distortions may range on a continuum of pathological severity, from the unawareness of paralysis in anosognosia for hemiplegia, to a more startling disturbance in denial of paralysis where belief may starkly conflict with reality. The patients' beliefs about their limitations typically represent attempts to make sense of limitations or to impart meaning to incongruous facts. These beliefs are often couched in recollections from past memories or previous experience, and are hard to modify even given new information. Various explanations of unawareness have been suggested, including sensory, cognitive, monitoring and feedback operations, feedforward mechanisms, disconnection theories, and hemispheric asymmetry hypotheses, along with psychological denial, to account for the curious lack of awareness in anosognosia and other awareness disorders. This paper addresses these varying explanations of the puzzling beliefs regarding hemiparesis in anosognosia. Furthermore, using the multi-dimensional nature of unawareness in anosognosia as a model, some startling belief distortions in other right-hemisphere associated clinical syndromes are also explored. Other neurobehavioral disturbances, though perhaps less common, reflect marked psychopathological distortions. Startling disorders of belief are notable in somatic illusions, non-recognition or delusional misattribution of limb ownership (asomatognosia, somatoparaphrenia), or delusional identity (Capgras syndrome) and misidentification phenomena. Difficulty in updating beliefs as a source of unawareness in anosognosia and other awareness disorders has been proposed. Processes of belief development are considered to be patterns of thought, memories, and experience, which coalesce in a sense of the bodily and personal self. A common consequence of such disorders seems to be an altered representation of the self, self-parts, or the external world. Astonishing nonveridical beliefs about the body, about space, or about the self, continue to invite exploration and to stimulate fascination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.