ArticleBrain sciences2025
Effect of EEG Electrode Numbers on Source Estimation in Motor Imagery.
Article in Brain sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The electroencephalogram (EEG) is one of the most popular neurophysiological methods in neuroscience. Scalp EEG measurements are obtained using various numbers of channels for both clinical and research applications. This pilot study explores the effect of EEG channel count on motor imagery classification using source analysis in brain-computer interface (BCI) applications. Different channel configurations are employed to evaluate classification performance. This study focuses on mu band signals, which are sensitive to motor imagery-related EEG changes. Common spatial patterns are utilized as a spatiotemporal filter to extract signal components relevant to the right hand and right foot extremities. Classification accuracies are obtained using configurations with 19, 30, 61, and 118 electrodes to determine the optimal number of electrodes in motor imagery studies. Experiments are conducted on the BCI Competition III Dataset Iva. The 19-channel configuration yields lower classification accuracy when compared to the others. The results from 118 channels are better than those from 19 channels but not as good as those from 30 and 61 channels. The best results are achieved when 61 channels are utilized. The average accuracy values are 83.63% with 19 channels, increasing to 84.70% with 30 channels, 84.73% with 61 channels, and decreasing to 83.95% when 118 channels are used.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.