Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40722274›Full record

ReviewBrain sciences2025

Exploring the Neural Correlates of Metal Exposure in Motor Areas.

Daniele Corbo, Roberto Gasparotti, Stefano Renzetti

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Daniele CorboDepartment of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences and Public Health, University of Brescia, 25123 Brescia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5078-6636
Roberto GasparottiDepartment of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences and Public Health, University of Brescia, 25123 Brescia, Italy.
Stefano RenzettiDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, 43121 Parma, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4467-765X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveEnvironmental and occupational exposure to toxic metals poses a significant risk to neurological health, particularly affecting motor-related brain structures. Essential metals like manganese, copper, and iron become neurotoxic when homeostasis is disrupted, while non-essential metals such as lead, mercury, and cadmium are inherently toxic, even at low exposure levels. We aimed to investigate the state of the art on neuroimaging evidence of the effects of exposure to toxic metals on motor related brain structures and functions.

methodsPRISMA guidelines were followed. We included studies that reported neuroimaging studies exploring the link between metal exposure and neural changes in motor areas.

resultsWe identified 518 papers, but only 20 articles were included. Our findings indicate that manganese is the most extensively studied metal in relation to the motor system using neuroimaging, but studies have also investigated the effects of other metals, including lead, mercury, and copper. Across these studies, the brain regions most consistently affected by metal exposure include the globus pallidus, caudate nucleus, frontal cortex, and cerebellum. Some studies exhibit structural or functional reductions in these areas that correlate with increased levels of metal exposure, suggesting a dose-dependent neurotoxic effect.

conclusionsThis review synthesizes current neuroimaging evidence on metal-induced neurotoxicity, emphasizing its impact on motor function and highlighting critical gaps to guide future research and public health strategies.

Indexed as

manganesemetal exposuremotorMRIneuroimaging

Identifiers

PMID40722274
PMCPMC12293884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.