Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40722264›Full record

ArticleBrain sciences2025

Examining Speech Perception-Production Relationships Through Tone Perception and Production Learning Among Indonesian Learners of Mandarin.

Keith K W Leung, Yu-An Lu, Yue Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Keith K W LeungDepartment of Linguistics, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6603-4148
Yu-An LuDepartment of Foreign Languages and Literatures, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu 300093, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-1472-5315
Yue WangDepartment of Linguistics, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3862-3767

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council 2011-312457Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council 2017-05978
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA transfer of learning effects across speech perception and production is evident in second-language (L2)-learning research, suggesting that perception and production are closely linked in L2 speech learning. However, underlying factors, such as the phonetic cue weightings given to acoustic features, of the relationship between perception and production improvements are less explored. To address this research gap, the current study explored the effects of Mandarin tone learning on the production and perception of critical (pitch direction) and non-critical (pitch height) perceptual cues.

methodsThis study tracked the Mandarin learning effects of Indonesian adult learners over a four-to-six-week learning period.

resultsWe found that perception and production gains in Mandarin L2 learning concurrently occurred with the critical pitch direction cue, F0 slope. The non-critical pitch height cue, F0 mean, only displayed a production gain.

conclusionsThe results indicate the role of critical perceptual cues in relating tone perception and production in general, and in the transfer of learning effects across the two domains for L2 learning. These results demonstrate the transfer of the ability to perceive phonological contrasts using critical phonetic information to the production domain based on the same cue weighting, suggesting interconnected encoding and decoding processes in L2 speech learning.

Indexed as

Mandarin tonesperception–production linksecond-language learningspeech perceptionspeech production

Identifiers

PMID40722264
PMCPMC12293670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.