ArticleEuropean journal of dental education : official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe2026
Technical Quality and Students' Perception of Endodontic Preclinical Training Using Natural or LikeReal Artificial Teeth.
Article in European journal of dental education : official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Technical Quality and Students' Perception of Endodontic Preclinical Training Using Natural or LikeReal Artificial Teeth.European journal of dental education : official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThis study evaluated and compared the technical quality of treatments performed during the preclinical training using artificial and natural teeth and the students' perceptions regarding their learning process with the 2 groups. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe study assessed the teeth used for preclinical training by 2nd-year students at São Leopoldo Mandic School of Dentistry. The natural teeth group (NTG) included the teeth used by the class of 2021, and the artificial teeth group (ATG) assessed the artificial teeth (LikeReal, Porto Alegre, Brazil) used by the class of 2022. The teeth were visually and radiographically observed, and the errors were divided according to the location in the crown or in the root. Errors in the crown included perforation, damage to the marginal ridge, fracture, and remnants of gutta-percha. Errors in the roots included overfilling, obturation at the apex, obturation > 2 mm short of the apex, voids, instrument separation, ledge, and root fracture. The students' perceptions were assessed by a questionnaire with 10 questions involving ethical, biohazard, technical challenges, and fairness of the evaluation. The chi-squared test was used for differences at p < 0.05.
results408 teeth were assessed, 204 in each group. In the NTG, remaining gutta-percha, 36 (17.64%); voids, 53 (25.98%); and root filling at the apex, 48 (23.52%), were the most common errors. In the ATG, remaining gutta-percha, 45 (22.05%); voids; and filling > 2 mm short, 65 (31.86%) were the most common errors. In the ATG, the occurrence of damage to the marginal ridge and filling > 2 mm short of the apex was less frequent than in the NTG; ledges and root fractures were more frequent in the ATG (p < 0.05). Regarding students' perception, NTG was superior in access and instrumentation; both groups thought that training with natural teeth was better. The students in the ATG were more concerned with the ethical and biohazard aspects.
conclusionsThe technical quality of the treatments was similar in both groups; however, artificial teeth were more prone to fracture, indicating that improvements are necessary for the material. The students' perception was that natural teeth are more appropriate for their training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.