Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40722190›Full record

ArticleCritical care (London, England)2025

Candida auris infections in ICU patients: risk factors, outcomes, and antifungal resistance patterns.

Satyajit Choudhury, Kalpana Majhi, Pragati Jena, Sritam Mohanty, Yallawar Nipun Narayan, Pragnya Paramita Jena, Shakti Bedanta Mishra, Sagarika Panda

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Clinical and Microbiological Characteristics of EarlyAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Structural barriers to antifungal drug development.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Review
  10. The rising challenge ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Review
  11. Hospital-acquiredJournal of family & community medicine
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Satyajit ChoudhuryDept of Critical Care Medicine, IMS & SUM Hospital, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4931-6447
Kalpana MajhiDept of Critical Care Medicine, IMS & SUM Hospital, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-0642-4197
Pragati JenaDept of Critical Care Medicine, IMS & SUM Hospital, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-6261-8291
Sritam MohantyDept of Critical Care Medicine, IMS & SUM Hospital, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-7741-2353
Yallawar Nipun NarayanDept of Critical Care Medicine, IMS & SUM Hospital, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-9053-3159
Pragnya Paramita JenaDept of Microbiology, IMS & SUM Hospital, Bhubaneswar, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3276-1758
Shakti Bedanta MishraDept of Critical Care Medicine, IMS & SUM Hospital, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6634-1877
Sagarika PandaDept of Critical Care Medicine, IMS & SUM Hospital, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India. sagarikapanda@soa.ac.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8547-5720

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCandida auris has emerged as a major nosocomial pathogen in intensive care units worldwide due to its multidrug resistance, environmental persistence, and high transmission potential. While several outbreak reports exist, there remains limited comparative data on clinical features, resistance profiles, and outcomes between Candida auris and non-auris Candida candidemia, particularly in Indian ICU settings. This study aimed to evaluate the incidence, risk factors, antifungal resistance, and clinical outcomes of Candida auris bloodstream infections in comparison to non-auris Candida infections among ICU patients.

methodsThis retrospective cohort study was conducted over four years (January 2020–December 2023) in the ICU of a tertiary care hospital in eastern India. Adult patients (≥ 18 years) with culture-confirmed candidemia were included and stratified into Candida auris and non-auris groups. Demographic, clinical, therapeutic, and microbiological data were extracted. Antifungal susceptibility testing was performed as per CLSI and CDC guidelines. Multivariate logistic regression identified risk factors associated with Candida auris infection. Survival analysis were compared using Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression analysis.

resultsOf 267 ICU patients with candidemia, 38 (14.2%) had Candida auris infection. Candida auris patients were older (median age 60 vs. 53 years) and had lower SOFA scores at admission (median 7 vs. 8; p = 0.02). On multivariate analysis, increasing age (OR 1.10, p = 0.0003) and female sex (OR 16.35, p = 0.012) were independently associated with Candida auris infection. Fluconazole resistance was 94.7% in Candida auris isolates, with amphotericin B and echinocandin resistance in 39.5% and 7.9%, respectively. ICU mortality did not differ significantly between Candida auris and non-auris groups (31.6% vs. 34.5%; p = 0.854), and survival analysis showed no statistically significant difference (log-rank p = 0.07).

conclusionThis study highlights the growing burden of Candida auris in intensive care unit settings, demonstrating a substantial incidence without increased mortality compared to non-auris Candida species. Advancing age and female sex emerged as significant independent risk factors, emphasizing the need for continued surveillance and targeted risk assessment in regions where Candida auris is endemic.

Indexed as

Candida aurisCandidiasisAdultAgedAntifungal AgentsCandidiasis, InvasiveCohort StudiesDrug Resistance, FungalFemaleHumansIncidenceIndiaIntensive Care UnitsLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedAntifungal AgentsAntifungal resistanceCandida aurisCandidemiaIntensive care unitRisk factors

Identifiers

PMID40722190
PMCPMC12305948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.