Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40722144›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025

Evaluating the implementation of maternal safety bundles for obstetric hemorrhage and severe hypertension during pregnancy in Arkansas.

Cheng Peng, Mahip Acharya, Batool Khattab, Jennifer A Callaghan-Koru, Dawn Brown, Rosalyn Perkins, Hari Eswaran

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Cheng PengDivison of Pharmaceutical Evaluation and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA. CPeng@uams.edu.
Mahip AcharyaInstitute for Digital Health & Innovation, College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Batool KhattabDivison of Pharmaceutical Evaluation and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Jennifer A Callaghan-KoruDepartment of Health Behavior and Health Education, Fay Boozman College of Public Health, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Fayetteville, AR, USA.
Dawn BrownInstitute for Digital Health & Innovation, College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Rosalyn PerkinsInstitute for Digital Health & Innovation, College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Hari EswaranInstitute for Digital Health & Innovation, College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMaternal mortality remains a critical public health concern in the U.S., with rising rates in recent years. Obstetric hemorrhage and hypertension in pregnancy are leading causes of preventable maternal mortality and morbidity. Maternal safety bundles, developed by the Alliance for Innovation on Maternal Health, provide guidelines to improve maternal health outcomes. This study examined the implementation of obstetric hemorrhage and severe hypertension safety bundles in Arkansas hospitals, identifying factors associated with successful adoption.

methodsSafety bundle implementation data were collected from 37 hospitals in the third quarter of 2023. Hospital characteristics were obtained from the American Hospital Association database. Implementation index scores were calculated as the percentage of recommended elements adopted, both overall and within specific domains. Descriptive statistics summarized hospital characteristics and implementation status. Implementation differences across domains were assessed using Friedman's test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test, while between-bundle comparisons were evaluated using the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test.

resultsA total of 23 hospitals (62%) were in the urban region, while 14 hospitals (38%) were located in rural areas. In the obstetrical hemorrhage bundle, Readiness domain had significantly higher implementation than Recognition and Prevention (p = 0.0005) and Reporting and Systems Learning domains (p < 0.0001). In the severe hypertension bundle, Readiness (p < 0.0001), Recognition and Prevention (p = 0.0035), and Response (p < 0.0001) domains all had higher scores than Reporting and Systems Learning domain. The Recognition and Prevention domain had significantly higher implementation in the severe hypertension bundle than in the obstetrical hemorrhage bundle (p = 0.0351). Urban hospitals had significantly higher obstetrical hemorrhage bundle implementation scores than rural hospitals (p = 0.0121). Hospitals with more full-time facility personnel and registered nurses demonstrated better implementation of both obstetrical hemorrhage (facility personnel: p = 0.0454; registered nurses: p = 0.0126) and severe hypertension (facility personnel: p = 0.0180; registered nurses: p = 0.0093) bundles.

conclusionsReadiness components were the most frequently implemented, while Reporting and Systems Learning elements had lower adoption rates. Urban hospitals had higher obstetric hemorrhage bundle implementation levels than rural hospitals. Hospitals with greater staffing resources, particularly full-time facility personnel and registered nurses, demonstrated better implementation of safety bundles. Findings highlight the need for targeted interventions to enhance maternal safety bundle adoption, especially in rural hospitals and under-implemented domains.

Indexed as

Hypertension, Pregnancy-InducedPatient Care BundlesPostpartum HemorrhageArkansasFemaleHospitalsHumansMaternal MortalityPregnancyHealthcare Quality ImprovementHospital ImplementationMaternal safety bundlesObstetric HemorrhageSevere Hypertension in Pregnancy

Identifiers

PMID40722144
PMCPMC12302679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.