ArticleBMC nursing2025
Correlation analysis of satisfaction with subspecialty management model in operating rooms: a cross-sectional survey in China.
Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe operating room (OR) presents a highly demanding environment due to its complexity in clinical work. This study examines the sub-specialty management model of operating rooms from various evaluative perspectives. We intend to assess the influence of this model on overall operating room quality using a scientific methodology, thereby establishing a foundation for future optimization of operating room management. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn September 2024, a convenience sampling method was employed across 22 provinces, five autonomous regions, and four municipalities directly administered by the central government. A total of 731 hospital surveys were disseminated. The questionnaire encompassed five dimensions: specialty care, nursing care quality, academic research, patient satisfaction, and nursing growth Through reliability analysis, validity analysis, correlation analysis, and regression analysis, we investigated the relationships among these variables and their influence on satisfaction with the OR subspecialty management model.
resultDescriptive statistical analysis indicated that "specialty care" attained the highest overall evaluation, with a mean score of 4.51 ± 0.420. Examination of Dimensional Variations among Hospitals of Distinct Grades.Significant differences exist in speciality nursing (t = 2.890, p < 0.001) and nurse growth (t = 1.997, p < 0.05) between tertiary and secondary medical institutions, with tertiary institutions exhibiting superior performance in speciality nursing mean (4.528 ± 0.404) and nurse growth mean (4.120 ± 0.415). Correlation analysis revealed a significant positive correlation (p < 0.001) among speciality nursing, nursing quality, scientific research and academia, nurse-patient satisfaction, and nurse growth.
conclusionThe sub-specialty management model for operating rooms has markedly enhanced the professionalism and safety of surgical procedures, emerging as a pivotal trend in contemporary operating room management. The creation of a specialized management evaluation model for operating rooms offers a robust scientific foundation for enhancing operating room management. The enhancement of operating room management efficiency can be significantly achieved by fortifying specialty nursing, advancing nurse career development, and elevating scientific research and service quality through multidimensional collaborative improvements, thereby promoting the quality and advancement of subspecialty management in operating rooms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.