SynthesisBMC pulmonary medicine2025
Effects of exercise training on exercise capacity of patients with interstitial lung disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe effects of exercise-based interventions in patients with interstitial lung disease ( ILD) are not fully understood. To better understand the effects of exercise training on functional exercise capacity, we conducted a meta-analysis.
objectiveThis systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effects of exercise training on the functional exercise capacity of adults with ILD.
methodsWe searched the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases from inception to July 2024 and the reference lists of the included articles. All RCT that included exercises and outcomes assessed the functional exercise capacity of adults with ILD. Data were pooled with the mean difference or standardized, random-effect model, and 95% confidence intervals ( CI) using RevMan V.5.4. We also used Cochrane risk-of-bias tool and GRADE to rate the quality of the evidence.
resultsSixteen RCTs with 899 participants were included. Exercise interventions significantly improved 6MWD ( ILD: MD = 35.88 m(m), 95% CI: 22.65-49.10, P < 0.00001; IPF: MD = 28.84 m, 95% CI: 14.73-42.95, P < 0.0001), enhanced peak work rate ( ILD: MD = 3.79 watts, 95% CI: 0.66-6.92, P < 0.05; IPF: MD = 5.98 watts, 95% CI: 2.34-9.63, P < 0.01), VO2 peak ( IPF: MD = 0.84 ml/kg/min, 95% CI: 0.18-1.50, P < 0.05), alleviate dyspnea ( ILD:MD = -0.46, 95% CI:-0.68,-0.23, P < 0.0001; IPF: MD = -0.33, 95% CI:-0.63,-0.03, P < 0.05), depressive symptoms ( ILD:MD = -1.94, 95% CI:-3.67, -0.22, P < 0.05), and improved health-related quality of life( HRQoL) ( ILD:MD = -6.39, 95% CI:-8.67,-4.12, P < 0.00001; IPF: MD = -6.58, 95% CI:-9.42,-3.75, P < 0.00001). In the subgroup with different intervention durations, functional exercise and quality of life improvements were maintained during the short-to long-term follow-up. However, dyspnea was significant only after 6 months of intervention.
conclusionExercise training demonstrated significant improvements in exercise tolerance and HRQoL in patients with ILD, particularly IPF, with sustained benefits observed over long-term intervention. Additionally, exercise alleviates dyspnea and depressive symptoms, with effects maintained during short to medium-term interventions. These findings support the safe incorporation of exercise training into standard therapeutic regimens for ILD. Future studies should prioritize the optimization of high-quality exercise protocols tailored to specific ILD subtypes and determine optimal strategies for maximizing clinical benefits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.