ArticleBMC cancer2025
The effect of smoking on breast cancer screening results in female population: a study in Wu wei, China.
Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Factors Associated with Standardized Diagnosis and Treatment of Breast Cancer: A Real-World Multicenter Study.Cancer management and research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveBased on Anderson model theory, a pathway analysis model of breast cancer screening population in this region was constructed to explore the impact of smoking on breast cancer screening results, in order to provide reference for refining breast cancer screening strategies and programs.
methodsFirstly, the distribution of each variable in terms of whether breast related diseases were detected was described by single factor analysis. Then, based on the results of factor screening, a screening outcome pathway analysis model for female breast cancer screening population in 2021-2023 was constructed to determine the influence path and influence coefficient of smoking on breast cancer screening results.
resultsA total of 1,792 female residents participated in breast cancer screening between 2021 and 2023, and 353 were detected with breast related disease, a detection rate of 19.7%. The result of path analysis model shows that the overall model fits well (RMSEA<0.001、CFI = 1.000、TLI = 1.001、SRMR = 0.024). The most significant variable of propensity characteristic dimension is the highest education (t=-2.135,P = 0.033); The significant variable in the dimension of medical behavior was smoking (t = 2.504,P = 0.012). The path coefficient indicates that the female population with lower education and smoking is more likely to detect mamma-related lesions in the screening population. In addition to the direct effect of smoking on the detection of mast-related lesions (effect size - 0.105), smoking also acted as a mediating variable to mediate the indirect effect of the highest education on the detection of mast-related lesions (effect size - 0.016).
conclusionThe results of this study confirmed the impact of smoking on breast cancer screening results, suggesting that health workers should further strengthen the publicity and education of residents on smoking cessation, optimize local screening strategies, and strengthen local residents' awareness of primary cancer prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.