Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40722012›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2025

Prediction of early postoperative complications and transfusion risk after lumbar spinal stenosis surgery in geriatric patients: machine learning approach based on comprehensive geriatric assessment.

Wounsuk Rhee, Sam Yeol Chang, Bong-Soon Chang, Hyoungmin Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Wounsuk RheeMinistry of Health and Welfare, Government of the Republic of Korea, 13, Doum 4-ro, Sejong, 30113, Republic of Korea.
Sam Yeol ChangDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 103, Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea. hewl3102@gmail.com.
Bong-Soon ChangDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 103, Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea.
Hyoungmin KimHealthcare AI Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, 101, Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLumbar spinal stenosis is one of the most common surgery-requiring conditions of the spine in the aged population. As elderly patients often present with multiple comorbidities and limited physiological reserve, individualized risk assessment using comprehensive geriatric assessment is crucial for optimizing surgical outcomes.

methodsPatients 65 years or older who underwent elective surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis between June 2015 and December 2018 were prospectively enrolled, resulting in 261 eligible patients of age 72.3 ± 4.8 years (male 108, female 153). Twenty-seven experienced complications of Clavien-Dindo grade 2 or higher within 30 days, and 79 received transfusion during hospital stay. The cohort was split into train-validation (n = 208) and test (n = 53) sets. A total of 48 features, including demographics, comorbidity, nutrition, and perioperative status, were collected. Logistic regression, support vector machine (SVM), random forest, XGBoost, and LightGBM were trained using five-fold cross-validation. AUROC and AUPRC were considered the primary performance metrics, and the results were compared with those estimated with ACS-NSQIP scoring system. A set of Compact models incorporating a smaller number of features was also trained, and SHAP analysis was conducted to evaluate the models' interpretability.

resultsThe reduced number of features did not result in the drop of AUROC and AUPRC for all machine learning algorithms (P > 0.05). when compared to the ACS-NSQIP scoring system, which achieved a test AUROC of 0.38 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.13-0.73) and 0.22 (95% CI, 0.10-0.36) on the first two tasks, the Compact model showed significantly greater AUROC values nearing or surpassing 0.90. Decision tree-based algorithms demonstrated larger test AUROC than logistic regression and generally agreed on the most influential features for each task.

conclusionsAdvanced machine learning models have consistently shown greater performance and interpretability over conventional methodologies, implying their potential for a more individualized risk assessment of the aged population.

trial registrationNot applicable as this research is not a clinical trial.

Indexed as

Blood TransfusionGeriatric AssessmentLumbar VertebraeMachine LearningPostoperative ComplicationsSpinal StenosisAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleProspective StudiesRisk AssessmentArtificial intelligenceComprehensive geriatric analysisLumbar spinal stenosisMachine learningModel explainabilityPersonalized medicinePostoperative complicationsTransfusion

Identifiers

PMID40722012
PMCPMC12306017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.