ArticleBMC cancer2025
Prediction of 1p/19q state in glioma by integrated deep learning method based on MRI radiomics.
Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Artificial intelligence in brain tumor diagnosis and surgical planning: Recent advances.Surgical neurology international · 2026Review
- Multi-Omics Integration for Advancing Glioma Precision Medicine.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo predict the 1p/19q molecular status of Lower-grade glioma (LGG) patients nondestructively, this study developed a deep learning (DL) approach using radiomic to provide a potential decision aid for clinical determination of molecular stratification of LGG.
methodsThe study retrospectively collected images and clinical data of 218 patients diagnosed with LGG between July 2018 and July 2022, including 155 cases from The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA) database and 63 cases from a regional medical centre. Patients' clinical data and MRI images were collected, including contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images and T2-weighted images. After pre-processing the image data, tumour regions of interest (ROI) were segmented by two senior neurosurgeons. In this study, an Ensemble Convolutional Neural Network (ECNN) was proposed to predict the 1p/19q status. This method, consisting of Variational Autoencoder (VAE), Information Gain (IG) and Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), is compared with four machine learning algorithms (Random Forest, Decision Tree, K-Nearest Neighbour, Gaussian Neff Bayes). Fivefold cross-validation was used to evaluate and calibrate the model. Precision, recall, accuracy, F1 score and area under the curve (AUC) were calculated to assess model performance.
resultsOur cohort comprises 118 patients diagnosed with 1p/19q codeletion and 100 patients diagnosed with 1p/19q non-codeletion. The study findings indicate that the ECNN method demonstrates excellent predictive performance on the validation dataset. Our model achieved an average precision of 0.981, average recall of 0.980, average F1-score of 0.981, and average accuracy of 0.981. The average area under the curve (AUC) for our model is 0.994, surpassing that of the other four traditional machine learning algorithms (AUC: 0.523-0.702). This suggests that the model based on the ECNN algorithm performs well in distinguishing the 1p/19q molecular status of LGG patients.
conclusionThe deep learning model based on conventional MRI radiomic integrates VAE and IG methods. Compared with traditional machine learning algorithms, it shows the best performance in the prediction of 1p/19q molecular co-deletion status. It may become a potentially effective tool for non-invasively and effectively identifying molecular features of lower-grade glioma in the future, providing an important reference for clinicians to formulate individualized diagnosis and treatment plans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.