ArticleBMC microbiology2025
Design of genus-specific semi-nested primers for simple and accurate identification of Enterobacter strains.
Article in BMC microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Genome sequences of 71 ecologically and geographically diverseMicrobiology resource announcements · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe genus Enterobacter, in the family Enterobacteriaceae, is of both clinical and environmental importance. This genus has undergone frequent taxonomic changes, making it challenging to identify taxa even at genus level. This study aimed to design Enterobacter genus-specific primers that can be used for simple PCR identification of large sets of putative Enterobacter isolates.
resultsComparative genomic approaches were employed to identify genes that were universally present on Enterobacter genomes but absent from the genomes of other members of the family Enterobacteriaceae, based on an initial set of 89 genomes. The presence of these genes was further confirmed in 4,276 Enterobacter RefSeq genomes. While no strictly genus-specific genes were identified, the hpaB gene demonstrated a restricted distribution outside of the genus Enterobacter. Semi-nested primers were designed for hpaB and its flanking gene hpaC (hpaBC) and evaluated on 123 strains in single-tube PCR reactions. All taxa showing positive reactions belonged to the genus Enterobacter. For Enterobacter strains the PCR yielded two amplicons at 110 bp and at 370 bp, while strains only displaying the 110 bp amplicon were classified as Leclercia pneumoniae. A blind-test on 120 strains accessioned as Enterobacter sp. from the USDA-ARS culture collection (NRRL), revealed that one third of the strains had an incorrect genus assignment. Comparison of gene trees of the hpaBC fragment sequences with marker genes frequently used for single-gene barcoding or multi-locus sequence analysis (MLSA) further demonstrated its potential for preliminary species identification.
conclusionsThe nested PCR assay represents a rapid and cost-effective approach for preliminary identification of Enterobacter species. As the primer design was based on large-scale genomic comparison, including currently undescribed species clades, it will remain valid even after taxonomic changes within the genus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.