Trial reportBMC primary care2025
Baseline cohort data from HARMONY, a cluster randomised controlled trial of culturally safe domestic violence management in general practice.
Trial report in BMC primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A culturally-safe primary care intervention for migrant/refugee women suffering domestic violence and abuse: HARMONY-a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial.BMC medicine · 2026Trial
- Invisible Wounds: A Systematic Review of Domestic Violence Against Women.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDomestic violence and abuse (DVA) is a globally prevalent, health damaging problem. In high income countries, migrant /refugee populations from low/middle income countries often consist of young families. DVA is more prevalent, and barriers to disclosure greater among migrant/refugee than native-born families. Consequently, general practice (GP) patient populations are increasingly diverse, but evidence for culturally safe and effective GP management is minimal. The HARMONY study tested a culturally safe DVA intervention to improve GP identification and referral among South Asian families.
methodsHARMONY was a pragmatic cluster RCT in 19 GP clinics in two regions of Melbourne, Australia. Eligible practices required ≥ 1 South Asian GP; used one of two common software programs; and agreed to have GrHanite™ software on practice computers. This analysis investigated baseline DVA and ethnicity identification in routine electronic GP data. Deidentified aggregated data for female patients aged ≥ 18 with DVA identification, referral, and South Asian ethnicity data were extracted from medical records. Chi Square for comparison of proportions.
resultsTwenty-four clinics were recruited and randomised, but five dropped out due to Covid. Fifty-two percent (50/96) of 19 clinics' staff were South Asian. While 46.7% of female patients (21,220/45,438) were aged 26-45 years, 17.6% (7,874/45,438) were South Asian. There were more South Asian patients in Comparison 20.6% (4,193/20,312) than Intervention 14.7% (3,681/25,126) clinics. South Asian women had less access to Medicare (83% vs 97%) and pensions (13% vs 22%). At baseline, clinicians recorded 0.58% (265/45,438) DVA-affected women. Notably, they identified fewer South Asian (0.38%) (28/7,874) than non-South Asian women experiencing DVA (0.63%) (237/37,564),-0.28% (0.12%-0.43%), p = 0.004. No referrals were identified.
conclusionDVA was notably under-identified in these patient populations, but worse among South-Asian female patients. While almost one in six of HARMONY's female population were South Asian, fewer than four in 1000 South Asian women were identified as experiencing DVA. Greater effort to regularly train and to support GP clinics to better identify DVA is vital but even more important in diverse communities to provide culturally safe DVA identification, care and documentation.
trial registrationACTRN12618001845224 on 13/11/2018.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.