Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40721996›Full record

ArticleBMC microbiology2025

Effects of species and sex on the gut microbiome of four laboratory-reared fruit fly lines (Diptera: Tephritidae) using full-length 16S rRNA PacBio Kinnex sequencing.

Sayaka Aoki, Mikinley Weaver, Tyler J Simmonds, Ikkei Shikano, Scott M Geib, Charles J Mason

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sayaka AokiTropical Pest Genetics and Molecular Biology Research Unit, Pacific Basin Agricultural Research Center, Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service, 64 Nowelo St. Hilo, HI, 96720, USA.
Mikinley WeaverTropical Pest Genetics and Molecular Biology Research Unit, Pacific Basin Agricultural Research Center, Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service, 64 Nowelo St. Hilo, HI, 96720, USA.
Tyler J SimmondsTropical Pest Genetics and Molecular Biology Research Unit, Pacific Basin Agricultural Research Center, Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service, 64 Nowelo St. Hilo, HI, 96720, USA.
Ikkei ShikanoDepartment of Plant and Environmental Protection Sciences, College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources, University of Hawai'i at Mānoa, 3050 Maile Way, Gilmore Hall 513, Honolulu, HI, 96822, USA.
Scott M GeibTropical Pest Genetics and Molecular Biology Research Unit, Pacific Basin Agricultural Research Center, Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service, 64 Nowelo St. Hilo, HI, 96720, USA.
Charles J MasonTropical Pest Genetics and Molecular Biology Research Unit, Pacific Basin Agricultural Research Center, Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service, 64 Nowelo St. Hilo, HI, 96720, USA. Charles.Mason@usda.gov.

Funding

Agricultural Research Service 0201-88888-003-000DAnimal and Plant Health Inspection Service 58-2040-3-021-IANational Institute of Food and Agriculture HAW09051-H
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInsect gut microbiomes, including tephritid fruit flies, are shaped by multiple endogenous and environmental factors. While host species is a well-known driver of the gut microbiome of adult tephritids, the influence of sex is less clear. Our study evaluated the impacts of host sex and species influence the microbiome in laboratory-reared tephritids when controlled for location, time, and adult diet. We evaluated the gut microbiome of four lines of pest tephritid fruit fly adults (Bactrocera dorsalis, Bactrocera latifrons, Ceratitis capitata, Zeugodacus cucurbitae) using near full-length 16S rRNA sequencing with a PacBio Kinnex concatenation-based approach. We analyzed groups of males and females from each species at the same set of time, across four timepoints in a core insectary.

resultsResults demonstrate a clear impact of fruit fly species on the gut microbiome composition of the different fruit flies. Furthermore, for B. dorsalis, B. latifrons, and C. capitata, we saw an influence of sex on ASV composition. However, while there was a separation of samples between the sexes for each timepoint, there was no characteristic male or female microbiome in all cases. The use of near full-length 16S rRNA sequencing did not have a marked improvement in beta-diversity interpretation over V4 subunit, with most detected taxa matching those described from other tephritids, but did allow for improved taxonomic classification at the genus level.

conclusionsOur results demonstrate that under laboratory conditions, different fruit fly species still exhibit distinct microbiomes. The impact of sex did have an impact on the gut microbiome of some species, but the magnitude of effect differed between hosts. This indicates that the sex has some impact on structuring the gut microbiome, but in a case-by-case basis. While full-length 16S rRNA sequencing affords improved classification, our study did not indicate an improvement over partial-fragments on beta-diversity metrics.

Indexed as

BacteriaGastrointestinal MicrobiomeRNA, Ribosomal, 16STephritidaeAnimalsDNA, BacterialFemaleMalePhylogenySequence Analysis, DNASex FactorsSpecies SpecificityDNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16SBacteriaDigestionDipteraInsectInvasivePestSymbiont

Identifiers

PMID40721996
PMCPMC12306104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.