ArticleBMC microbiology2025
Effects of species and sex on the gut microbiome of four laboratory-reared fruit fly lines (Diptera: Tephritidae) using full-length 16S rRNA PacBio Kinnex sequencing.
Article in BMC microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative analyses of the Serratia marcescens complex reveal variations in their pathogenicity against a fruit pest.Pest management science · 2026Article
- Ecological Drivers of Microbiota Diversity in the Pharmacophagous Turnip Sawfly.Environmental microbiology · 2026Article
- Microbial Inoculants Alleviate Continuous Cropping Obstacles in Eggplant Through Soil Properties and Rhizosphere Microbiota.Microorganisms · 2026Article
- Effects of feeding black soldier fly larvae with yellow wine lees on growth performance, nutrient composition, and gut microbiota.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
- Evolutionary dynamics of type VI secretion systems in fruit fly-associatedFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundInsect gut microbiomes, including tephritid fruit flies, are shaped by multiple endogenous and environmental factors. While host species is a well-known driver of the gut microbiome of adult tephritids, the influence of sex is less clear. Our study evaluated the impacts of host sex and species influence the microbiome in laboratory-reared tephritids when controlled for location, time, and adult diet. We evaluated the gut microbiome of four lines of pest tephritid fruit fly adults (Bactrocera dorsalis, Bactrocera latifrons, Ceratitis capitata, Zeugodacus cucurbitae) using near full-length 16S rRNA sequencing with a PacBio Kinnex concatenation-based approach. We analyzed groups of males and females from each species at the same set of time, across four timepoints in a core insectary.
resultsResults demonstrate a clear impact of fruit fly species on the gut microbiome composition of the different fruit flies. Furthermore, for B. dorsalis, B. latifrons, and C. capitata, we saw an influence of sex on ASV composition. However, while there was a separation of samples between the sexes for each timepoint, there was no characteristic male or female microbiome in all cases. The use of near full-length 16S rRNA sequencing did not have a marked improvement in beta-diversity interpretation over V4 subunit, with most detected taxa matching those described from other tephritids, but did allow for improved taxonomic classification at the genus level.
conclusionsOur results demonstrate that under laboratory conditions, different fruit fly species still exhibit distinct microbiomes. The impact of sex did have an impact on the gut microbiome of some species, but the magnitude of effect differed between hosts. This indicates that the sex has some impact on structuring the gut microbiome, but in a case-by-case basis. While full-length 16S rRNA sequencing affords improved classification, our study did not indicate an improvement over partial-fragments on beta-diversity metrics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.