Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40721992›Full record

ArticleJournal of proteome research2025

Backyard Proteomics: A Case Study with the Black Widow Spider.

Tarsh Shah, Jackson A Fitzpatrick, Benjamin C Orsburn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of proteome research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tarsh ShahThe Advanced Academics Biotechnology Program, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, United States.
Jackson A FitzpatrickProteomic ünd Genomic Sciences, Baltimore, Maryland 21214, United States.
Benjamin C OrsburnOrgan Pathobiology and Therapeutics Institute The University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15223, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0774-3750

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nearly all methods of mass-spectrometry-based proteomics rely on knowing the proteome of the species. In less studied organisms without annotated genomes, it can seem impossible to perform proteomic analysis. In this study, we sought to answer the question: does enough information exist to do proteomics on any organism we want? As a case study, we started with material available due to an infestation of a home with black widow spiders. Thanks to the recent publication of an annotated genome for one species of black widow spider, we were able to identify 5502 protein groups and assign putative annotations using ortholog mapping. We also demonstrate that had we not had this resource, over 2000 proteins could be identified using other available spider genome annotations, despite their unrelatedness. Moreover, regardless of the spider proteome used, proteins annotated as toxins were almost exclusively observed in the main body of the mature female black widow spider. Overall, these results provide a draft proteome map for the black widow spider and valuable data for validating machine learning models while also suggesting that the door to insightful quantitative proteomics may already be open for millions of less studied organisms. All raw and processed proteomic data are available through the ProteomeXchange repository as accession PXD051601.

Indexed as

Black Widow SpiderProteomeProteomicsAnimalsDatabases, ProteinFemaleMolecular Sequence AnnotationProteomeDIAmetaproteomicsnonmodel organism proteomicsspiderstoxins

Identifiers

PMID40721992
PMCPMC12418487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.