ArticleTropical animal health and production2025
Determination of milk yield in water buffaloes using multi-class logistic regression and machine learning methods.
Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study, Random Forest, Gradient Boosting Machines (GBM), and Support Vector Machines (SVM), Multi-Class Logistic Regression (MCLR) models were comparatively evaluated for the prediction of milk yield in water buffaloes. The study's main purpose was to compare the success of the determined models in milk yield predictions with their accuracy rates. In response to reviewer feedback, the methodology was enhanced to include stratified 8-fold cross-validation, hyperparameter tuning for RF, GBM, and SVM, and the removal of the multicollinear AGE variable. The revised dataset comprised the following features: lactation period (LP), lactation milk yield (LDMY), age at first pregnancy (1stPregAge), and feed type. Model training and evaluation were conducted using Python 3.7 with Pandas, NumPy, Scikit-learn, and Matplotlib libraries. According to the updated findings, the GBM model outperformed others, achieving an average accuracy of 64.63%, weighted precision of 0.6578, recall of 0.6463, F1-score of 0.6311, and ROC AUC of 0.6625. While the predictive performance remains moderate, these results demonstrate the potential of advanced machine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40721977What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.