Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40721905›Full record

ArticlePlanta2025

Soil salinity effects on inter-plant signalling in wild cotton are contingent on herbivore load and differentially shape direct and indirect defences.

Jonathan Interian-Aguiñaga, Uriel Solís-Rodriguez, Yeyson Briones-May, Patricia Guadarrama-Chávez, Marine Mamin, Mary V Clancy, Ted C J Turlings, Xoaquín Moreira, Luis Abdala-Roberts

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Planta, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jonathan Interian-AguiñagaDepartamento de Ecología Tropical, Campus de Ciencias Biológicas y Agropecuarias, Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán, Km. 15.5 Carretera Mérida-Xmatkuil S/N, Mérida, Yucatán, 97200, México.
Uriel Solís-RodriguezUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Escuela Nacional de Estudios Superiores Unidad Mérida, Carretera Mérida-Tetiz Km. 4.5, 97357, Ucú, Yucatán, México.
Yeyson Briones-MayDepartamento de Ecología Tropical, Campus de Ciencias Biológicas y Agropecuarias, Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán, Km. 15.5 Carretera Mérida-Xmatkuil S/N, Mérida, Yucatán, 97200, México.
Patricia Guadarrama-ChávezUnidad Multidisciplinaria de Docencia e Investigación de Sisal, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Puerto de Abrigo S/N, 97355, Sisal, México.
Marine MaminInstitute of Biology, Fundamental and Applied Research in Chemical Ecology, University of Neuchâtel, Rue Emile-Argand 11, CH-2000, Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
Mary V ClancyInstitute of Biology, Fundamental and Applied Research in Chemical Ecology, University of Neuchâtel, Rue Emile-Argand 11, CH-2000, Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
Ted C J TurlingsState Key Laboratory of Cotton Bio-Breeding and Integrated Utilization, School of Life Sciences, Henan University, Kaifeng, 475004, China.
Xoaquín Moreira *Misión Biológica de Galicia (MBG-CSIC), Apdo. 28, 36080, Pontevedra, Spain.
Luis Abdala-Roberts *Departamento de Ecología Tropical, Campus de Ciencias Biológicas y Agropecuarias, Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán, Km. 15.5 Carretera Mérida-Xmatkuil S/N, Mérida, Yucatán, 97200, México. luis.abdala@correo.uady.mx.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1394-3043

Funding

Fundación General CSIC COOPA20477Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung 315230_185319
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MAIN

conclusionInter-plant signalling effects on cotton defences are shaped by the joint effects of emitter herbivore load and soil salinity stress, with latter strengthening such effects on direct defences but weakening those on indirect defences. Volatile-mediated plant-to-plant signalling in response to herbivory is well documented, but its contingency on abiotic factors and variation in herbivore load is poorly understood. To address this gap, we investigated how soil salinity levels and herbivore load may influence signalling effects on plant defences and resistance in wild cotton (Gossypium hirsutum), using the specialist herbivore Alabama argillacea (cotton leafworm). We conducted a greenhouse experiment where plants were grouped in triplets: one acting as the emitter and the other two as receivers. Each triplet was placed inside a mesh cage. Both emitters and receivers were exposed to either ambient (control) or augmented soil salinity. Emitters at each salinity level underwent three treatments: no damage, damage by one or three caterpillars. After 48 h of damage, we collected VOCs from the emitters, which were removed from the cages at 72 h. Afterwards, we damaged the receiver plants to test for the priming effects on the induction of extrafloral nectar (EFN) and terpenoid aldehyde content, as well as on resistance to herbivory. Herbivory increased VOC emissions significantly under high herbivory load, but salinization reduced this effect. Receivers exposed to VOC from plants with high herbivore load induced a greater EFN concentration compared to those exposed to control emitters, an effect that disappeared under augmented salinity. Soil salinity did not affect the signalling effect on terpenoid aldehyde content but did influence herbivore resistance. These findings suggest that signalling depends on herbivore load and soil salinity, with the latter enhancing or affecting the induction depending on the plant defense traits.

Indexed as

GossypiumHerbivoryMothsPlant Defense Against HerbivorySalinitySignal TransductionSoilAnimalsLarvaVolatile Organic CompoundsSoilVolatile Organic CompoundsAbiotic factorsCotton leafwormExtrafloral nectarGossypiumPrimingResistanceVolatiles

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.