Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40721871›Full record

ArticleNature methods2025

GeneAgent: self-verification language agent for gene-set analysis using domain databases.

Zhizheng Wang, Qiao Jin, Chih-Hsuan Wei, Shubo Tian, Po-Ting Lai, Qingqing Zhu, Chi-Ping Day, Christina Ross, Robert Leaman, Zhiyong Lu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature methods, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. A comprehensive survey of AI agents in healthcare.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2026
    Review
  16. Article
  17. An AI-Powered Trisomy 21 Research Assistant.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  18. SpikeLab: Agentic tools for spike data analysis.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Zhizheng Wang *Division of Intramural Research, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2584-136X
Qiao Jin *Division of Intramural Research, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1268-7239
Chih-Hsuan WeiDivision of Intramural Research, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Shubo TianDivision of Intramural Research, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6415-1439
Po-Ting LaiDivision of Intramural Research, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Qingqing ZhuDivision of Intramural Research, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Chi-Ping DayCancer Data Science Laboratory, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Christina RossCancer Data Science Laboratory, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Robert LeamanDivision of Intramural Research, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Zhiyong LuDivision of Intramural Research, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA. zhiyong.lu@nih.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9998-916X

Funding

Machine Learning and Natural Language Processing for Biomedical ApplicationsZIALM237241 · NLM · NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE · PI LU, ZHIYONG · 2023 to 2025
$12.2M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA LM237241
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene-set analysis seeks to identify the biological mechanisms underlying groups of genes with shared functions. Large language models (LLMs) have recently shown promise in generating functional descriptions for input gene sets but may produce factually incorrect statements, commonly referred to as hallucinations in LLMs. Here we present GeneAgent, an LLM-based AI agent for gene-set analysis that reduces hallucinations by autonomously interacting with biological databases to verify its own output. Evaluation of 1,106 gene sets collected from different sources demonstrates that GeneAgent is consistently more accurate than GPT-4 by a significant margin. We further applied GeneAgent to seven novel gene sets derived from mouse B2905 melanoma cell lines. Expert review confirmed that GeneAgent produces more relevant and comprehensive functional descriptions than GPT-4, providing valuable insights into gene functions and expediting knowledge discovery.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyDatabases, GeneticAnimalsCell Line, TumorHumansMelanomaMice

Identifiers

PMID40721871
PMCPMC12328209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.