ArticleScientific reports2025
The potential of machine learning in classifying relapse and non-relapse in children with clubfoot based on movement patterns.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The diverse nature and timing of a clubfoot relapse pose challenges for early detection. A relapsed clubfoot typically involves a combination of deformities affecting a child's movement pattern across multiple joint levels, formed by a complex kinematic chain. Machine learning algorithms have the capacity to analyse such complex nonlinear relationships, offering the potential to train a model that assesses whether a child has relapsed clubfoot based on their movement pattern. Hence, this study aimed to explore to what extent biomechanical data collected with three-dimensional movement analysis can be used to classify children with relapsed clubfoot from children with non-relapsed clubfoot. The findings demonstrated the potential of subject classification based on kinematic movement patterns, where combining dynamic activities improves sensitivity in distinguishing children with relapsed clubfoot from children with non-relapsed clubfoot. Moreover, the study highlights biomechanical features that should be considered during clinical follow-up of children with clubfoot. This might aid early identification and treatment of relapsed clubfoot, which is expected to prevent the necessity of surgical treatment in these young patients. However, for future application of machine learning classification in clinical practice, a larger subject population will be necessary to develop a generalizable and robust model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.