Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40721839›Full record

ArticleResearch involvement and engagement2025

If it wasn't for us, there would be no data: stakeholders' perspectives on patient involvement in the use of health data in Ireland.

Tina Bedenik, Fiona Geaney, Barbara Foley, Rachel Flynn, Kathleen E Bennett

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research involvement and engagement, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The need for clear medical data ownership laws.Journal of translational medicine · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tina BedenikData Science Centre, School of Population Health, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland. tinabedenik@rcsi.ie.
Fiona GeaneyHealth Information and Standards Directorate, Health Information and Quality Authority (HIQA), Cork, Ireland.
Barbara FoleyHealth Information and Standards Directorate, Health Information and Quality Authority (HIQA), Cork, Ireland.
Rachel FlynnHealth Information and Standards Directorate, Health Information and Quality Authority (HIQA), Cork, Ireland.
Kathleen E BennettData Science Centre, School of Population Health, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland.

Funding

Science Foundation Ireland 20/SP/8955 and 21/RC/10294_P2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLegislative reform in Ireland and Europe, including the introduction of a Health Information Bill in Ireland and the European Health Data Space (EHDS) Regulation, promote strong governance of health data, including control over how health data is used for different purposes, such as individual care, research, planning and policy-making. The aim of this study was to explore key stakeholders’ perspectives on the role of patients in enabling inclusive and ethical use of health data for primary and secondary purposes in Ireland.

methodsThis was a cross-sectional qualitative study with focus group design. Thirty-five participants were evenly distributed across five groups: Academics and Researchers; Data Controllers, Data Protection Officers and Ethics Experts; Patients and Public; Healthcare Professionals and the Industry Group. A semi-structured approach guided by a topic guide was used, and thematic data analysis was conducted.

resultsThis study identified strong support for increased patient involvement. However, contradictions in participants’ views within and across groups were found particularly around patient control over health data and data ownership and embedding Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) in research. Most of the participants agreed that patient autonomy over health data is of ‘vital’ importance; yet they advocated for staged and delayed patient access. Similarly, the participants believed that PPI was required to drive the direction of research and funding allocation; however, patients’ lack of understanding of research areas was a challenge. Concerns were expressed around informed consent required for sharing of patient data, particularly with the industry, and around the timing of consent when patients are at their most vulnerable.

conclusionParticipants expressed strong support for increased patient involvement in the use of health data in Ireland; however, there were contrasting views in relation to data control and ownership, consent processes and PPI. These findings have implications for policy development in the implementation of the EHDS in Europe, and the establishment of the Health Data Access Body in Ireland. This study emphasises the importance of patient involvement to support successful implementation of new health information systems and data access infrastructure.

Indexed as

Ethical useHealth dataIreland.Patient and public involvementPrimary usePurposeQualitative researchSecondary use

Identifiers

PMID40721839
PMCPMC12306090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.