ArticleOrphanet journal of rare diseases2025
Lessons learned from a muscle study in nail-patella syndrome.
Article in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Orthopedic manifestations and management of nail-patella syndrome: a narrative review.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundNail-patella (NPS) syndrome is an autosomal dominant disorder caused by mutations in the LMX1B gene and manifests with involvement of kidneys, nails, eyes as well as skeletal musculature. NPS shows some clinical similarities with Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy. However, thus far human muscle tissue has not been analysed in the context of NPS to precisely clarify the muscular involvement in this multi-systemic disease.
methodsTo study the effects of a missense variant in LMX1B on human skeletal muscle, histological, immunofluorescence and ultra-structural studies were performed on a deltoid muscle biopsy performed at the age of 2 aiming to analyse potential pathologies in muscle fibres in addition to unbiased proteomic profiling to identify dysregulated proteins.
resultsMicroscopic work-up of the muscle biopsy revealed no striking pathologies, except for some atrophic fibres. The proteomic analyses unveiled a clustered number of dysregulated keratin proteins among the downregulated proteins.
conclusionAlthough NPS can also present with a muscular phenotype indicated by muscular weakness of the upper extremities, elevated CK levels and contractures of the elbow joint, there is no evidence of primary muscular involvement due to expression of mutant LMX1B. The examination of human skeletal muscle tissue confirmed the findings from the animal models showing that the skeletal muscle symptoms of NPS may be the result of a developmental disorder of the extremities that leads to impaired muscle mobilisation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.