ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2025
Radiographic identification method of safe medial pinning zone and its clinical efficacy in pediatric supracondylar humeral fracture fixation.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesPreventing iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury remains a critical challenge during medial pinning in pediatric supracondylar humeral fractures (SCHFs). This study seeks to define a safe zone for medial pin insertion and evaluate its effectiveness in minimizing complications.
methodsThree-dimensional reconstructions of radiographs from a healthy elbow joint were generated using E3d software to delineate a safe medial pinning zone. Pediatric patients with modified Gartland type III or IV SCHFs who underwent closed reduction and percutaneous crossed pin fixation were categorized into two groups based on the medial pin entry point observed via intraoperative fluoroscopy. A retrospective analysis was performed to assess the safety and effectiveness of pin placement. Furthermore, in a case of postoperative ulnar nerve dysfunction, the standard medial pinning technique was replaced with the defined safe entry approach.
resultsOn the anteroposterior (AP) view, the upper segment of the oblique line was identified as the safe zone, as the ulnar nerve lies within the groove at the lower segment. On the lateral view, a diamond-shaped area was confirmed as the safe insertion zone for medial pinning. The study included 134 SCHF cases, divided into group A (74 cases), where medial Kirschner wire (K-wire) placement was within the defined safe zones in both views, and group B (60 cases), where placement occurred outside these zones. The incidence of ulnar nerve injury in group A was significantly lower than in group B (P = 0.0324). Additionally, exploration and neurolysis were performed in cases of postoperative ulnar nerve dysfunction. A left-handed maneuver during surgery was found to aid in the precise identification of the safe entry site for medial pinning.
conclusionsMedial pinning performed within the delineated safe zone, with guidance from intraoperative fluoroscopy, significantly reduces the likelihood of iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury in pediatric SCHF patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III retrospective comparative study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.