Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40721765›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2025

Innovative 3D-printed educational models for vital pulp treatments and local anesthesia training in pediatric dentistry.

Nagehan Aktaş, Didem Atabek, Osman Tunç

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nagehan AktaşDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Gazi University, Ankara, Türkiye. nagehanaktas@gazi.edu.tr.
Didem AtabekDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Gazi University, Ankara, Türkiye.
Osman TunçBtech Innovation, METU Technopark, Ankara, Türkiye.

Funding

Gazi University Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit TKA-2023-8863
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPreclinical training is essential across all areas of dental education. In pediatric dentistry, it is particularly valuable due to the unique challenges of working with young patients, and it provides a safe environment for students to gain confidence before transitioning to clinical care. Procedures such as local anesthesia administration and vital pulp therapy require specific skills that are best developed through simulation-based education. Recent advancements in three-dimensional (3D) printing technology offer innovative solutions to enhance dental education by providing realistic and patient-specific educational models. This study aimed to develop and evaluate two distinct 3D-printed educational models for pediatric dentistry training.

methodsA patient-derived cone beam computed tomography dataset was processed to create anatomically accurate models replicating primary molar structures, pulp chambers, and surrounding hard tissues. Sixty-six dental students (third-year, fifth-year, and postgraduate) participated in hands-on training using these models. Participants assessed the models' educational value, realism, and effectiveness using a structured survey.

results68.2% of students strongly agreed, and 28.8% agreed that the local anesthesia model enhanced their understanding of anatomical structures and injection sites. Additionally, 81.8% strongly agreed, and 18.2% agreed that visualizing anesthetized nerves enhanced their understanding of how anesthesia spreads within the tissue. In vital pulp therapy training, 71.8% of participants strongly agreed, and 27.3% agreed that the 3D-printed teeth provided a realistic simulation for pulp therapy procedures. 83.3% of students desired to use these models for more advanced methods, and 100% of third-year students strongly agreed that practicing 3D-printed models before treating actual patients would be beneficial. Compared to phantom and extracted teeth, 3D-printed models were perceived as more engaging and accessible, though extracted teeth remained superior in tactile authenticity.

conclusions3D-printed models contribute to a more structured and comprehensive educational process by bridging the gap between theoretical knowledge and hands-on experience. Integrating 3D printing technology into the dental curriculum has excellent potential to improve the quality of pediatric dentistry education and clinical preparation. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

Anesthesia, LocalEducation, DentalPediatric DentistryPrinting, Three-DimensionalChildClinical CompetenceCone-Beam Computed TomographyDental PulpHumansMaleModels, AnatomicStudents, Dental3D printed tooth3D printingDental educationEducational modelLocal anesthesiaPediatric dentistryVital pulp therapy

Identifiers

PMID40721765
PMCPMC12302569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.