ArticleInternational journal of emergency medicine2025
Barriers and facilitators for interaction in cardiopulmonary resuscitation teams: a qualitative study.
Article in International journal of emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Team dynamics, environmental safety, and emotional regulation in emergency department resuscitation: a qualitative study.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionCardiac arrest is a life-threatening emergency whose outcome depends on immediate interventions, known as cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). The quality of these interventions hinges on the performance and communication of the resuscitation team. Therefore, this study aimed to explore factors affecting interactions among CPR team members.
methodsThis qualitative study employed a content analysis approach conducted in Iran over a 12-month period from December 2023 to December 2024. The study population included all CPR team members at academic medical centers. Researchers used purposive sampling and continued recruitment until data saturation. Data collection involved conducting in-depth, semi-structured interviews; all data were analyzed using MAXQDA software (version 20).
resultsData analysis revealed one main category entitled "The Complexity of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Interactions," along with 5 general categories and 11 subcategories: "Consensus in Resuscitation" (including "Pre-resuscitation Coordination" and "Post-resuscitation Debriefing"), "Communication Clarity" (comprising "Regular Communication" and "Irregular Communication"), "Interaction in Team Rotation" (with "Normal Rotation" and "Abnormal Rotation"), "Personal Conflicts" (featuring "Pre-Resuscitation Conflicts" and "Intra-Resuscitation Conflicts"), and "Team Leadership Style" (encompassing "Autocratic Leadership," "Laissez-faire Leadership," and "Participatory Leadership").
conclusionThe results demonstrated that CPR team interactions were influenced by multiple factors. Through careful planning to enhance facilitating factors - including consensus in resuscitation, regular communication, normal rotation, and participatory leadership - while addressing inhibiting factors - such as irregular communication, personal conflicts, abnormal rotation, and autocratic leadership - we can optimize team interactions to improve CPR outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.