Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40721689›Full record

ArticleBehavior research methods2025

Bayesian sample size determination for longitudinal intervention studies with linear and log-linear growth.

Ulrich Lösener, Mirjam Moerbeek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior research methods, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ulrich LösenerDepartment of Methodology and Statistics, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands. u.c.losener1@uu.nl.
Mirjam MoerbeekDepartment of Methodology and Statistics, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.

Funding

Sociale en Geesteswetenschappen, NWO 406.21.GO.006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A priori sample size determination (SSD) is essential for designing cost-efficient trials and in avoiding underpowered studies. In addition, reporting a solid justification for a certain sample size is required by most ethics committees and many funding agencies. Often, SSD is based on null hypothesis significance testing (NHST), an approach that has received severe criticism in the past decades. As an alternative, Bayesian hypothesis evaluation using Bayes factors has been developed. Bayes factors quantify the relative support in the data for a pair of competing hypotheses without suffering from some of the drawbacks of NHST. SSD for Bayesian hypothesis testing relies on simulations and has only been studied recently. Available software for this is limited to simple models such as ANOVA and the t test, in which observations are assumed to be independent from each other. However, this assumption is rendered untenable in longitudinal experiments where observations are nested within individuals. In that case, a multilevel model should be used. This paper provides researchers with a valuable tool for performing SSD for multilevel models with longitudinal data in a Bayesian framework, along with the necessary theoretical background and concrete empirical examples. The open-source R function that enables researchers to tailor the simulation to their trial at hand can be found on the GitHub page of the first author.

Indexed as

Longitudinal StudiesSample SizeBayes TheoremComputer SimulationHumansLinear ModelsResearch DesignSoftwareBayes factorLog-linearLongitudinal dataMonte Carlo simulationMultilevel modelPowerSample size determination

Identifiers

PMID40721689
PMCPMC12304047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.