ArticleBehavior research methods2025
Bayesian sample size determination for longitudinal intervention studies with linear and log-linear growth.
Article in Behavior research methods, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A priori sample size determination (SSD) is essential for designing cost-efficient trials and in avoiding underpowered studies. In addition, reporting a solid justification for a certain sample size is required by most ethics committees and many funding agencies. Often, SSD is based on null hypothesis significance testing (NHST), an approach that has received severe criticism in the past decades. As an alternative, Bayesian hypothesis evaluation using Bayes factors has been developed. Bayes factors quantify the relative support in the data for a pair of competing hypotheses without suffering from some of the drawbacks of NHST. SSD for Bayesian hypothesis testing relies on simulations and has only been studied recently. Available software for this is limited to simple models such as ANOVA and the t test, in which observations are assumed to be independent from each other. However, this assumption is rendered untenable in longitudinal experiments where observations are nested within individuals. In that case, a multilevel model should be used. This paper provides researchers with a valuable tool for performing SSD for multilevel models with longitudinal data in a Bayesian framework, along with the necessary theoretical background and concrete empirical examples. The open-source R function that enables researchers to tailor the simulation to their trial at hand can be found on the GitHub page of the first author.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.