Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40721637›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Nonlinear response analysis of plan and vertical asymmetric reinforced concrete buildings under directional seismic loadings.

Pramod Kumar, Seeram Madhuri, Bamidele Charles Olaiya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Pramod KumarDepartment of Civil Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Jamshedpur, Jharkhand, 831013, India.
Seeram MadhuriDepartment of Civil Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Jamshedpur, Jharkhand, 831013, India.
Bamidele Charles OlaiyaDepartment of Civil Engineering, School of Engineering and Applied Sciences (SEAS), Kampala International University, Western Campus, Ishaka, Uganda. bmolaiya@kiu.ac.ug.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A nonlinear dynamic analysis is conducted on plan and vertically asymmetric reinforced concrete buildings subjected to directional seismic forces. The mathematical models are developed for building models. The plan asymmetry in the building is introduced by imposing uniaxial eccentricities of 6 m, 12 m, and 18 m. The vertical mass and stiffness asymmetry at different building levels is introduced by varying the mass or stiffness in the vertical direction. The peak displacement and the inter-storey drift ratio are evaluated. The vulnerability of asymmetric buildings to earthquake forces increases up to a specific eccentricity. Compared to stiffness and mass asymmetric buildings, stiffness asymmetry at the bottom floor and mass asymmetry at the top floor have shown a larger response in all the earthquakes and angles of study. The peak responses for plan and vertically symmetric buildings are observed under unidirectional earthquake forces. The peak displacement is 80 mm in the Y direction for the plan asymmetric structures. The vertical stiffness of asymmetric structures showed a peak response of 300 mm in the Y direction. The building with mass asymmetry at the top showed 199.18 mm in the Y direction. The authors recommend a detailed analysis of the design and analysis of asymmetric structures, especially to predict material failure.

Indexed as

Nonlinear analysisPeak responsePlan asymmetric buildingsVertical asymmetric buildings

Identifiers

PMID40721637
PMCPMC12304101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.