Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40721613›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Creating interpretable deep learning models to identify species using environmental DNA sequences.

Samuel Waggoner, Jon Donnelly, Rose Gurung, Laura Jackson, Chaofan Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Metabolic Regulation in the Maintenance ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Samuel WaggonerSchool of Computing and Information Science, University of Maine, Orono, 04469, USA. samuel.waggoner@maine.edu.
Jon DonnellyDepartment of Computer Science, Duke University, Durham, 27708, USA.
Rose GurungSchool of Computing and Information Science, University of Maine, Orono, 04469, USA.
Laura JacksonGraduate School of Biomedical Science and Engineering, University of Maine, Orono, 04469, USA.
Chaofan ChenSchool of Computing and Information Science, University of Maine, Orono, 04469, USA. chaofan.chen@maine.edu.

Funding

National Science Foundation 1849227National Science Foundation 1919478
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Monitoring species' presence in an ecosystem is crucial for conservation and understanding habitat diversity, but can be expensive and time consuming. As a result, ecologists have begun using the DNA that animals naturally leave behind in water or soil (called environmental DNA, or eDNA) to identify the species present in an environment. Recent work has shown that when used to identify species, convolutional neural networks (CNNs) can be as much as 150 times faster than ObiTools, a traditional method that does not use deep learning. However, CNNs are black boxes, meaning it is impossible to "fact check" why they predict that a given sequence belongs to a particular species. In this work, we introduce an interpretable, prototype-based CNN using the ProtoPNet framework that surpasses previous accuracy on a challenging eDNA dataset. The network is able to visualize the sequences of bases that are most distinctive for each species in the dataset, and introduces a novel skip connection that improves the interpretability of the original ProtoPNet. Our results show that reducing reliance on the convolutional output increases both interpretability and accuracy.

Indexed as

Deep LearningDNA, EnvironmentalAnimalsEcosystemNeural Networks, ComputerSequence Analysis, DNADNA, EnvironmentalArtificial intelligenceBiodiversity monitoringBioinformaticsConservation biologyEnvironmental DNA (eDNA)Interpretable machine learning

Identifiers

PMID40721613
PMCPMC12304181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.