ArticleScientific reports2025
Creating interpretable deep learning models to identify species using environmental DNA sequences.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Analyzing the enhancement of CNN-YOLO and transformer based architectures for real-time animal detection in complex ecological environments.Scientific reports · 2025Pooled it
- Metabolic Regulation in the Maintenance ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Monitoring species' presence in an ecosystem is crucial for conservation and understanding habitat diversity, but can be expensive and time consuming. As a result, ecologists have begun using the DNA that animals naturally leave behind in water or soil (called environmental DNA, or eDNA) to identify the species present in an environment. Recent work has shown that when used to identify species, convolutional neural networks (CNNs) can be as much as 150 times faster than ObiTools, a traditional method that does not use deep learning. However, CNNs are black boxes, meaning it is impossible to "fact check" why they predict that a given sequence belongs to a particular species. In this work, we introduce an interpretable, prototype-based CNN using the ProtoPNet framework that surpasses previous accuracy on a challenging eDNA dataset. The network is able to visualize the sequences of bases that are most distinctive for each species in the dataset, and introduces a novel skip connection that improves the interpretability of the original ProtoPNet. Our results show that reducing reliance on the convolutional output increases both interpretability and accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.