Observational studyScientific reports2025
Development of the Korean enhanced recovery after surgery audit program.
Observational study in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Validation of Textbook Outcome in Gastric Surgery (TOGS) for Primary Gastric Cancer in an Eastern High-Volume Center.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Pragmatic Criteria for Early Discharge After Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery: Safety and Applicability Outside ERAS Programs.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Beyond numeric scales: validity of the EQ-5D-5L pain/discomfort dimension in postoperative pain assessment after minimally invasive colorectal cancer surgery.The Korean journal of pain · 2026Article
- The effect of scheduled metamizole on opioid consumption after cardiac surgery.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Audit programs are essential for effective Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) implementation to monitor compliance, ensure adherence, and optimize outcomes. To address the lack of a tailored ERAS audit program in South Korea, we developed the Korean ERAS Research and Audit System (K-ERAS) in collaboration with anesthesiologists and surgeons. This system integrates data from a concurrently conducted prospective observational study on colorectal cancer surgery and features a real-time dashboard for perioperative outcome visualization and data completeness monitoring. Using records from 556 patients registered between October 2023 and October 2024, we assessed data completeness, dashboard feasibility, and ERAS compliance rates. Data entry for all patients was successfully completed, and the K-ERAS effectively captured and visualized perioperative data. The overall ERAS compliance rate was 47.4%, with notably low adherence to perioperative fasting (0.9% for both shortened preoperative fasting and carbohydrate loading, 2.5% for postoperative early water intake, and 29.0% for postoperative early oral feeding) and pain management protocols (2.7% for preemptive analgesia, 30.9% for regional analgesia, and 30.6% for routine use of two or more non-opioid analgesics postoperatively). The K-ERAS proved to be a reliable and adaptable system for managing perioperative data within an ERAS-focused framework.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.