ArticleNature communications2025
A central and unified role of corticocortical feedback in parsing visual scenes.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Specific expertise from diffuse feedback: A feedforward-gated mechanism.Science advances · 2026Article
- Border-ownership reversals determine the strength of metacontrast masking.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2026Article
- Occipital and parietal non-invasive brain stimulation enhances perceptual learning and transfer: evidence from high-frequency tRNS.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Visual scene analysis in the brain involves diverse grouping and segmentation processes mediated by intra- and inter-areal interactions, but the role of feedback from higher to lower visual cortices has remained largely speculative, relying mostly on indirect evidence. In this study with behaving monkeys, we investigated the causal impact of V4-to-V1 feedback on different figure-ground perceptual tasks employing distinct contextual cues. We compared neuronal responses in the primary visual cortex (V1) and the behavioral performance before and after silencing a higher-order visual area (V4). Our results reveal that V4-to-V1 feedback comprises dissociable facilitatory and inhibitory components that differ in their spatial distribution, onset time, modulatory polarity, and magnitude. This feedback is essential for, and consistent across, distinct grouping and segmentation processes, operating independently of V1 neurons' selectivity for local features and primarily modifying the late phases of neuronal responses. These findings highlight fundamental differences between the mechanisms underlying global, feature-independent figure-ground organization and local, feature-dependent contextual analysis. Moreover, while the feedback modifies correlated variability in neural responses, this effect does not alter the neural population code. Our study underscores the central and unified role of corticocortical feedback in integrating and interpreting visual scenes, with implications for circuit-level mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.