ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2025
Musculoskeletal Inverse Kinematics Tool for Inertial Motion Capture Data Based on the Adaptive Unscented Kalman Smoother: An Implementation for OpenSim.
Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeConventional tools for human kinematics estimation presume that observations are subject to uncorrelated, zero-mean Gaussian noise, and they provide no estimate for the uncertainty of their solutions. This paper presents AUKSMIKT-a tool for whole-body kinematics estimation in the Bayesian framework to account for these shortcomings.
methodsWe implemented AUKSMIKT as a C++ class that extends the OpenSim (v4.5) application programming interface. AUKSMIKT is based on the unscented Kalman filter combined with a run-time estimator of process and observation noises, and a fixed-lag Rauch-Tung-Striebel smoother. We tested the performance of AUKSMIKT using data from a public dataset consisting of both optical and inertial motion capture data recorded from overground walking subjects. We computed the mean absolute errors of estimated angular positions, velocities, and accelerations with respect to the gold standard optical motion capture estimates, and compared these metrics to those obtained from the least squares estimation-based tool native to OpenSim.
resultsAUKSMIKT produced smaller errors than the native tool for the angular position of three joints (0.8-1.9%), the velocities of six joints (0.7-
conclusionWith respect to the optical motion capture solution, AUKSMIKT can estimate lower-body kinematics from inertial motion capture data with comparable or higher accuracy than the native OpenSim least squares estimator.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.