ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026
Development and Evaluation of an Automated Histomorphometric Analysis Method for the Assessment of Implant Osseointegration.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study evaluated an automated histomorphometric analysis method for assessing implant osseointegration. Sixty-eight histological images of implants installed in the tibiae of 40 rats were analyzed using the manual method and ImageJ software to evaluate the %BIC (bone-implant contact) and %BBT (bone between the implant threads). In the automated histomorphometric analysis method, the similarity of the RGB color channels was analyzed, and the black background region of the image was excluded, to select the region of interest. The contour curve was extracted, excluding points that do not belong to the contact between the implant and the bone, i.e., the image edges. A Gaussian filter was applied to smooth small imperfections in the curve. An analysis of the curve points in relation to their neighboring points was conducted, and the local maximum of the curve was selected, excluding points that were too close together and keeping only those that represent the peaks of the implant curve. The peaks and the corresponding portion of the curve were used to select the region of the original image and calculate the %BIC and %BBT values. A comparison of the results obtained for both parameters in both evaluation methods was then performed using Pearson's correlation test. A strong correlation was observed between the analyses (r = 0.99). Thus, the proposed automated histomorphometric analysis method was shown to be reliable for assessing implant osseointegration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.